Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE, LAGO,BRUNO C., P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS, TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O., FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917
Resumo: ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer.
id ABC-1_08afa76034da35ee52437ea4503fc586
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0001-37652017000401917
network_acronym_str ABC-1
network_name_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn15N isotopeCrop-livestock integrationNitrogen use efficiencyNo-tillageUrochloa spp.Zea mays.ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.89 n.3 2017reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/0001-3765201720160811info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DEOLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DELAGO,BRUNO C.P. JUNIOR,CLOVISTRIVELIN,PAULO C.O.FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.eng2019-11-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652017000401917Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2019-11-29T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
title Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
spellingShingle Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE
15N isotope
Crop-livestock integration
Nitrogen use efficiency
No-tillage
Urochloa spp.
Zea mays.
title_short Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
title_full Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
title_fullStr Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
title_full_unstemmed Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
title_sort Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
author ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE
author_facet ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE
OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE
LAGO,BRUNO C.
P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS
TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O.
FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.
author_role author
author2 OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE
LAGO,BRUNO C.
P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS
TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O.
FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE
OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE
LAGO,BRUNO C.
P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS
TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O.
FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 15N isotope
Crop-livestock integration
Nitrogen use efficiency
No-tillage
Urochloa spp.
Zea mays.
topic 15N isotope
Crop-livestock integration
Nitrogen use efficiency
No-tillage
Urochloa spp.
Zea mays.
description ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0001-3765201720160811
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.89 n.3 2017
reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron:ABC
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron_str ABC
institution ABC
reponame_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
collection Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aabc@abc.org.br
_version_ 1754302864790913024