Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer. |
id |
ABC-1_08afa76034da35ee52437ea4503fc586 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0001-37652017000401917 |
network_acronym_str |
ABC-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn15N isotopeCrop-livestock integrationNitrogen use efficiencyNo-tillageUrochloa spp.Zea mays.ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.89 n.3 2017reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/0001-3765201720160811info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DEOLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DELAGO,BRUNO C.P. JUNIOR,CLOVISTRIVELIN,PAULO C.O.FAVARIN,JOSÉ L.eng2019-11-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652017000401917Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2019-11-29T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
title |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
spellingShingle |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE 15N isotope Crop-livestock integration Nitrogen use efficiency No-tillage Urochloa spp. Zea mays. |
title_short |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
title_full |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
title_fullStr |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
title_full_unstemmed |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
title_sort |
Palisadegrass effects on N fertilizer dynamic in intercropping systems with corn |
author |
ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE |
author_facet |
ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE LAGO,BRUNO C. P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O. FAVARIN,JOSÉ L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE LAGO,BRUNO C. P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O. FAVARIN,JOSÉ L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ALMEIDA,RODRIGO E.M. DE OLIVEIRA,SILAS M. DE LAGO,BRUNO C. P. JUNIOR,CLOVIS TRIVELIN,PAULO C.O. FAVARIN,JOSÉ L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
15N isotope Crop-livestock integration Nitrogen use efficiency No-tillage Urochloa spp. Zea mays. |
topic |
15N isotope Crop-livestock integration Nitrogen use efficiency No-tillage Urochloa spp. Zea mays. |
description |
ABSTRACT Corn grain yield, nitrogen (N) fertilizer efficiency and distribution to corn alone and three forms of corn and palisadegrass (Urochloa spp.) intercropping implantation was investigated. A field experiment with 15N labeling fertilizer was performed in randomized block design. No form of palisadegrass intercropping implantation affected corn grain yield, total N accumulation and N use efficiency (NUE), which were 8.7 t ha-1, 205 kg ha-1 and 37% respectively. The palisadegrass produced on average 1.9 t of dry mass, absorbing a maximum of 6 kg ha-1 or 5.5% of N fertilizer during corn growing. Furthermore, the palisadegrass did not affect N fertilizer distribution in soil-plant system, in which 28.2% was recovered in the soil and 40.4% in the plants (corn + palisadegrass). The results show that for the three intercropping implantation methods the palisadegrass did not compete with corn for N fertilizer. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652017000401917 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0001-3765201720160811 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.89 n.3 2017 reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) instacron:ABC |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
instacron_str |
ABC |
institution |
ABC |
reponame_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
collection |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||aabc@abc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302864790913024 |