Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins,Maurício L.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Azevedo,Tatiana M.P., Ghiraldelli,Luciana, Bernardi,Neuza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652010000200024
Resumo: This study compared the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias kept with swine dejects and tilapia from fee fishing fed commercial ration. A total of 360 fish were analyzed from August 2003 to July 2004 in a facility situated in Nova Trento, Santa Catarina, Brazil. No significant difference was observed in both systems. The parasite fauna in both systems were slightly similar, with the presence of the following parasites: Trichodina magna and T compacta (Ciliophora); Cichlidogyrus sclerosus and Cichlidogyrus sp. (Monogenoidea); and Lamproglena sp. (Lernaeidae). Parasitological analyzes did not differ among fishes kept with swine dejects and in fee fishing with commercial diet (P >0.05). The total prevalence of trichodinids in the gills of fish kept with swine dejects was 1.7% as compared to the one kept in fee fishing with commercial diet (0.6%). The Monogenoidea prevalence and mean intensity in the gills and body of fish from fee fishing was 16.5% and 2.6, and compared to other system was 13.2% and 0.8, respectively. This study showed that low stocking density and low water temperature in that region were responsible for the maintenance of good health and lower parasitism rate.
id ABC-1_67d14c21423fb2a7edb053885e8e8859
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0001-37652010000200024
network_acronym_str ABC-1
network_name_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?Oreochromis niloticusfee fishingswine dejectsMonogenoideaTrichodinaprevalenceThis study compared the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias kept with swine dejects and tilapia from fee fishing fed commercial ration. A total of 360 fish were analyzed from August 2003 to July 2004 in a facility situated in Nova Trento, Santa Catarina, Brazil. No significant difference was observed in both systems. The parasite fauna in both systems were slightly similar, with the presence of the following parasites: Trichodina magna and T compacta (Ciliophora); Cichlidogyrus sclerosus and Cichlidogyrus sp. (Monogenoidea); and Lamproglena sp. (Lernaeidae). Parasitological analyzes did not differ among fishes kept with swine dejects and in fee fishing with commercial diet (P >0.05). The total prevalence of trichodinids in the gills of fish kept with swine dejects was 1.7% as compared to the one kept in fee fishing with commercial diet (0.6%). The Monogenoidea prevalence and mean intensity in the gills and body of fish from fee fishing was 16.5% and 2.6, and compared to other system was 13.2% and 0.8, respectively. This study showed that low stocking density and low water temperature in that region were responsible for the maintenance of good health and lower parasitism rate.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652010000200024Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.82 n.2 2010reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/S0001-37652010000200024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins,Maurício L.Azevedo,Tatiana M.P.Ghiraldelli,LucianaBernardi,Neuzaeng2010-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652010000200024Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2010-06-11T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
title Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
spellingShingle Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
Martins,Maurício L.
Oreochromis niloticus
fee fishing
swine dejects
Monogenoidea
Trichodina
prevalence
title_short Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
title_full Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
title_fullStr Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
title_full_unstemmed Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
title_sort Can the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias be affected by different production systems?
author Martins,Maurício L.
author_facet Martins,Maurício L.
Azevedo,Tatiana M.P.
Ghiraldelli,Luciana
Bernardi,Neuza
author_role author
author2 Azevedo,Tatiana M.P.
Ghiraldelli,Luciana
Bernardi,Neuza
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins,Maurício L.
Azevedo,Tatiana M.P.
Ghiraldelli,Luciana
Bernardi,Neuza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oreochromis niloticus
fee fishing
swine dejects
Monogenoidea
Trichodina
prevalence
topic Oreochromis niloticus
fee fishing
swine dejects
Monogenoidea
Trichodina
prevalence
description This study compared the parasitic fauna on Nile tilapias kept with swine dejects and tilapia from fee fishing fed commercial ration. A total of 360 fish were analyzed from August 2003 to July 2004 in a facility situated in Nova Trento, Santa Catarina, Brazil. No significant difference was observed in both systems. The parasite fauna in both systems were slightly similar, with the presence of the following parasites: Trichodina magna and T compacta (Ciliophora); Cichlidogyrus sclerosus and Cichlidogyrus sp. (Monogenoidea); and Lamproglena sp. (Lernaeidae). Parasitological analyzes did not differ among fishes kept with swine dejects and in fee fishing with commercial diet (P >0.05). The total prevalence of trichodinids in the gills of fish kept with swine dejects was 1.7% as compared to the one kept in fee fishing with commercial diet (0.6%). The Monogenoidea prevalence and mean intensity in the gills and body of fish from fee fishing was 16.5% and 2.6, and compared to other system was 13.2% and 0.8, respectively. This study showed that low stocking density and low water temperature in that region were responsible for the maintenance of good health and lower parasitism rate.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652010000200024
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652010000200024
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0001-37652010000200024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.82 n.2 2010
reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron:ABC
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron_str ABC
institution ABC
reponame_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
collection Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aabc@abc.org.br
_version_ 1754302857621798912