The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652019000101002 |
Resumo: | Abstract: This essay discusses the problem of the lack of dialogue between theory/empirical reality in the construction of the theoretical structure of dissertations and doctorates in Human Sciences in Brazil; taking Geography as an example, Santos (2000) observed this problem, which persists at the national level. The proposal is to present the question and to suggest the relationship between theory/empirical reality coming of the dialogue with specific research questions. It is these research questions that will define the limitations, factors, agents, processes and structures that will be studied. The relationship between the construction of the theoretical references with specific problems allowing theoretical-methodological advances, thus adapting the reading of the general theory to empirical situations. This appropriation generates both methodological directions for how to treat the empirical and the understandings that will be used in the discussion of the results. The confrontation and discussion of the results will suggest affirmations, questions and new perceptions for the theory. |
id |
ABC-1_7d29ce067a414cf5c08992a34f2e78d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0001-37652019000101002 |
network_acronym_str |
ABC-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problemsEmpirical theoryresearch questionsmethodological theoryhuman scienceAbstract: This essay discusses the problem of the lack of dialogue between theory/empirical reality in the construction of the theoretical structure of dissertations and doctorates in Human Sciences in Brazil; taking Geography as an example, Santos (2000) observed this problem, which persists at the national level. The proposal is to present the question and to suggest the relationship between theory/empirical reality coming of the dialogue with specific research questions. It is these research questions that will define the limitations, factors, agents, processes and structures that will be studied. The relationship between the construction of the theoretical references with specific problems allowing theoretical-methodological advances, thus adapting the reading of the general theory to empirical situations. This appropriation generates both methodological directions for how to treat the empirical and the understandings that will be used in the discussion of the results. The confrontation and discussion of the results will suggest affirmations, questions and new perceptions for the theory.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652019000101002Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.91 n.1 2019reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/0001-3765201920171020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGOMES,RODRIGO DUTRAeng2019-04-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652019000101002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2019-04-16T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
title |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
spellingShingle |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems GOMES,RODRIGO DUTRA Empirical theory research questions methodological theory human science |
title_short |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
title_full |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
title_fullStr |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
title_full_unstemmed |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
title_sort |
The theorical-methodological construction of theses and dissertations and their epistemological problems |
author |
GOMES,RODRIGO DUTRA |
author_facet |
GOMES,RODRIGO DUTRA |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
GOMES,RODRIGO DUTRA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Empirical theory research questions methodological theory human science |
topic |
Empirical theory research questions methodological theory human science |
description |
Abstract: This essay discusses the problem of the lack of dialogue between theory/empirical reality in the construction of the theoretical structure of dissertations and doctorates in Human Sciences in Brazil; taking Geography as an example, Santos (2000) observed this problem, which persists at the national level. The proposal is to present the question and to suggest the relationship between theory/empirical reality coming of the dialogue with specific research questions. It is these research questions that will define the limitations, factors, agents, processes and structures that will be studied. The relationship between the construction of the theoretical references with specific problems allowing theoretical-methodological advances, thus adapting the reading of the general theory to empirical situations. This appropriation generates both methodological directions for how to treat the empirical and the understandings that will be used in the discussion of the results. The confrontation and discussion of the results will suggest affirmations, questions and new perceptions for the theory. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652019000101002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652019000101002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0001-3765201920171020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.91 n.1 2019 reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) instacron:ABC |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
instacron_str |
ABC |
institution |
ABC |
reponame_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
collection |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||aabc@abc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302867273940992 |