Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652016000300923 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to estimate the accuracy of mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian cancer. A quantitative systematic review was performed. A comprehensive search of the Medline, LILACS, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Biomed Central, and ISI Web of Science databases was conducted from January 1990 to June 2015. For inclusion in this systematic review, the papers must have measured mesothelin levels in at least two histological diagnoses; ovarian cancer (borderline or ovarian tumor) vs. benign or normal ovarian tissue. For each study, 2 x 2 contingency tables were constructed. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. The verification bias was performed according to QUADAS-2. Statistical analysis was performed with the software Stata 11, Meta-DiSc(r) and RevMan 5.2. Twelve studies were analyzed, which included 1,561 women. The pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (CI 95% 0.58 - 0.66) and specificity was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.92 - 0.95). The DOR was 38.92 (CI 95% 17.82 - 84.99). Our systematic review shows that mesothelin cannot serve alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer. |
id |
ABC-1_e53ec2e8c2126a86f80fa84b3b7073b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0001-37652016000300923 |
network_acronym_str |
ABC-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysisovarian tumorsmesothelinmeta-analysisbiomarkerstatisticalThe objective of this work was to estimate the accuracy of mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian cancer. A quantitative systematic review was performed. A comprehensive search of the Medline, LILACS, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Biomed Central, and ISI Web of Science databases was conducted from January 1990 to June 2015. For inclusion in this systematic review, the papers must have measured mesothelin levels in at least two histological diagnoses; ovarian cancer (borderline or ovarian tumor) vs. benign or normal ovarian tissue. For each study, 2 x 2 contingency tables were constructed. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. The verification bias was performed according to QUADAS-2. Statistical analysis was performed with the software Stata 11, Meta-DiSc(r) and RevMan 5.2. Twelve studies were analyzed, which included 1,561 women. The pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (CI 95% 0.58 - 0.66) and specificity was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.92 - 0.95). The DOR was 38.92 (CI 95% 17.82 - 84.99). Our systematic review shows that mesothelin cannot serve alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652016000300923Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.88 n.2 2016reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/0001-3765201620150107info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMADEIRA,KRISTIANDONDOSSOLA,EDUARDO R.FARIAS,BRUNA F. DESIMON,CARLA S.ALEXANDRE,MARIA C.M.SILVA,BRUNO R.ROSA,MARIA INÊSeng2016-06-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652016000300923Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2016-06-30T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
title |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis MADEIRA,KRISTIAN ovarian tumors mesothelin meta-analysis biomarker statistical |
title_short |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
title_full |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
author |
MADEIRA,KRISTIAN |
author_facet |
MADEIRA,KRISTIAN DONDOSSOLA,EDUARDO R. FARIAS,BRUNA F. DE SIMON,CARLA S. ALEXANDRE,MARIA C.M. SILVA,BRUNO R. ROSA,MARIA INÊS |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
DONDOSSOLA,EDUARDO R. FARIAS,BRUNA F. DE SIMON,CARLA S. ALEXANDRE,MARIA C.M. SILVA,BRUNO R. ROSA,MARIA INÊS |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MADEIRA,KRISTIAN DONDOSSOLA,EDUARDO R. FARIAS,BRUNA F. DE SIMON,CARLA S. ALEXANDRE,MARIA C.M. SILVA,BRUNO R. ROSA,MARIA INÊS |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ovarian tumors mesothelin meta-analysis biomarker statistical |
topic |
ovarian tumors mesothelin meta-analysis biomarker statistical |
description |
The objective of this work was to estimate the accuracy of mesothelin as a biomarker for ovarian cancer. A quantitative systematic review was performed. A comprehensive search of the Medline, LILACS, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Biomed Central, and ISI Web of Science databases was conducted from January 1990 to June 2015. For inclusion in this systematic review, the papers must have measured mesothelin levels in at least two histological diagnoses; ovarian cancer (borderline or ovarian tumor) vs. benign or normal ovarian tissue. For each study, 2 x 2 contingency tables were constructed. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. The verification bias was performed according to QUADAS-2. Statistical analysis was performed with the software Stata 11, Meta-DiSc(r) and RevMan 5.2. Twelve studies were analyzed, which included 1,561 women. The pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (CI 95% 0.58 - 0.66) and specificity was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.92 - 0.95). The DOR was 38.92 (CI 95% 17.82 - 84.99). Our systematic review shows that mesothelin cannot serve alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652016000300923 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652016000300923 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0001-3765201620150107 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.88 n.2 2016 reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) instacron:ABC |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
instacron_str |
ABC |
institution |
ABC |
reponame_str |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
collection |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||aabc@abc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302862833221632 |