Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FERREIRA,LUCAS B.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: CUNHA,FERNANDO F. DA, SILVA,GUSTAVO H. DA, CAMPOS,FLAVIO B., DIAS,SANTOS H.B., SANTOS,JANNAYTON E.O.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652021000101506
Resumo: Abstract The Penman-Monteith equation is recommended for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo). However, it requires meteorological data that are commonly unavailable. Thus, this study evaluates artificial neural network (ANN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and the original and calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and Penman-Monteith temperature (PMT) equations for the estimation of daily ETo using temperature. Two scenarios were considered: (i) local, models were calibrated/developed and evaluated using data from individual weather stations; (ii) regional, models were calibrated/developed using pooled data from several stations and evaluated independently in each one. Local models were also evaluated outside the calibration/training station. Data from 9 stations were used. The original PMT outperformed the original HS, but after local or regional calibrations, they performed similarly. The locally calibrated equations and the local machine learning models exhibited higher performances than their regional versions. However, the regional models had higher generalization capacity, with a more stable performance between stations. The machine learning models performed better than the equations evaluated. When comparing the ANN models with the HS equation, mean RMSE reduced from 0.96 to 0.87 and from 0.84 to 0.73, in regional and local scenarios, respectively. ANN and MARS performed similarly, with a slight advantage for ANN.
id ABC-1_ec495bd19fd0c9aab8bd64c7b6e10140
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0001-37652021000101506
network_acronym_str ABC-1
network_name_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid regionANNcross-stationexternal validationMARSregional modelsAbstract The Penman-Monteith equation is recommended for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo). However, it requires meteorological data that are commonly unavailable. Thus, this study evaluates artificial neural network (ANN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and the original and calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and Penman-Monteith temperature (PMT) equations for the estimation of daily ETo using temperature. Two scenarios were considered: (i) local, models were calibrated/developed and evaluated using data from individual weather stations; (ii) regional, models were calibrated/developed using pooled data from several stations and evaluated independently in each one. Local models were also evaluated outside the calibration/training station. Data from 9 stations were used. The original PMT outperformed the original HS, but after local or regional calibrations, they performed similarly. The locally calibrated equations and the local machine learning models exhibited higher performances than their regional versions. However, the regional models had higher generalization capacity, with a more stable performance between stations. The machine learning models performed better than the equations evaluated. When comparing the ANN models with the HS equation, mean RMSE reduced from 0.96 to 0.87 and from 0.84 to 0.73, in regional and local scenarios, respectively. ANN and MARS performed similarly, with a slight advantage for ANN.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652021000101506Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.93 n.1 2021reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/0001-3765202120200304info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFERREIRA,LUCAS B.CUNHA,FERNANDO F. DASILVA,GUSTAVO H. DACAMPOS,FLAVIO B.DIAS,SANTOS H.B.SANTOS,JANNAYTON E.O.eng2021-03-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652021000101506Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2021-03-24T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
title Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
spellingShingle Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
FERREIRA,LUCAS B.
ANN
cross-station
external validation
MARS
regional models
title_short Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
title_full Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
title_fullStr Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
title_full_unstemmed Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
title_sort Generalizability of machine learning models and empirical equations for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration from temperature in a semiarid region
author FERREIRA,LUCAS B.
author_facet FERREIRA,LUCAS B.
CUNHA,FERNANDO F. DA
SILVA,GUSTAVO H. DA
CAMPOS,FLAVIO B.
DIAS,SANTOS H.B.
SANTOS,JANNAYTON E.O.
author_role author
author2 CUNHA,FERNANDO F. DA
SILVA,GUSTAVO H. DA
CAMPOS,FLAVIO B.
DIAS,SANTOS H.B.
SANTOS,JANNAYTON E.O.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FERREIRA,LUCAS B.
CUNHA,FERNANDO F. DA
SILVA,GUSTAVO H. DA
CAMPOS,FLAVIO B.
DIAS,SANTOS H.B.
SANTOS,JANNAYTON E.O.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ANN
cross-station
external validation
MARS
regional models
topic ANN
cross-station
external validation
MARS
regional models
description Abstract The Penman-Monteith equation is recommended for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo). However, it requires meteorological data that are commonly unavailable. Thus, this study evaluates artificial neural network (ANN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and the original and calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and Penman-Monteith temperature (PMT) equations for the estimation of daily ETo using temperature. Two scenarios were considered: (i) local, models were calibrated/developed and evaluated using data from individual weather stations; (ii) regional, models were calibrated/developed using pooled data from several stations and evaluated independently in each one. Local models were also evaluated outside the calibration/training station. Data from 9 stations were used. The original PMT outperformed the original HS, but after local or regional calibrations, they performed similarly. The locally calibrated equations and the local machine learning models exhibited higher performances than their regional versions. However, the regional models had higher generalization capacity, with a more stable performance between stations. The machine learning models performed better than the equations evaluated. When comparing the ANN models with the HS equation, mean RMSE reduced from 0.96 to 0.87 and from 0.84 to 0.73, in regional and local scenarios, respectively. ANN and MARS performed similarly, with a slight advantage for ANN.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652021000101506
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652021000101506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0001-3765202120200304
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.93 n.1 2021
reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron:ABC
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron_str ABC
institution ABC
reponame_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
collection Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aabc@abc.org.br
_version_ 1754302869749628928