Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baran,Mehmet
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252021000200508
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study is to compare the seismic performances of strengthening techniques applied to reinforced concrete (RC) non-ductile frames tested under the effects of seismic loads. In the experimental part of the study, one-third scale, one-bay, two-storey non-ductile hollow brick infilled RC frames were strengthened with five different techniques and tested under reversed cyclic lateral loads. One being reference, five of the frames were infilled with hollow bricks and plastered on both sides, one was strengthened with plain mortar, one was strengthened with steel fiber reinforced mortar, two were strengthened with precast RC plates. The last frame was strengthened with RC infill wall. Strengthening techniques increased strength and stiffnesses of the frames in the ranges from 57% to 189% and from 186% to 486% respectively. In the numerical analysis part, an existing RC non-ductile building located in Istanbul, strengthened with the techniques, were analyzed using a computer program. Numerical results were evaluated in terms of interstorey drift ratio together with the overall seismic performance of the building.
id ABCM-1_13e2dd169661780e2a0e0898f8846284
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-78252021000200508
network_acronym_str ABCM-1
network_name_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniquesStrengtheninghollow brick infill wallplain mortarsteel fiber reinforced mortarprecast reinforced concrete (RC) platereinforced concrete (RC) infill wallseismic performanceAbstract The aim of this study is to compare the seismic performances of strengthening techniques applied to reinforced concrete (RC) non-ductile frames tested under the effects of seismic loads. In the experimental part of the study, one-third scale, one-bay, two-storey non-ductile hollow brick infilled RC frames were strengthened with five different techniques and tested under reversed cyclic lateral loads. One being reference, five of the frames were infilled with hollow bricks and plastered on both sides, one was strengthened with plain mortar, one was strengthened with steel fiber reinforced mortar, two were strengthened with precast RC plates. The last frame was strengthened with RC infill wall. Strengthening techniques increased strength and stiffnesses of the frames in the ranges from 57% to 189% and from 186% to 486% respectively. In the numerical analysis part, an existing RC non-ductile building located in Istanbul, strengthened with the techniques, were analyzed using a computer program. Numerical results were evaluated in terms of interstorey drift ratio together with the overall seismic performance of the building.Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252021000200508Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.18 n.2 2021reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)instacron:ABCM10.1590/1679-78256340info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaran,Mehmeteng2021-03-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-78252021000200508Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1679-7825&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br1679-78251679-7817opendoar:2021-03-16T00:00Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
title Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
spellingShingle Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
Baran,Mehmet
Strengthening
hollow brick infill wall
plain mortar
steel fiber reinforced mortar
precast reinforced concrete (RC) plate
reinforced concrete (RC) infill wall
seismic performance
title_short Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
title_full Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
title_fullStr Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
title_sort Comparison of seismic performances of reinforced concrete frames strengthened by different techniques
author Baran,Mehmet
author_facet Baran,Mehmet
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baran,Mehmet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Strengthening
hollow brick infill wall
plain mortar
steel fiber reinforced mortar
precast reinforced concrete (RC) plate
reinforced concrete (RC) infill wall
seismic performance
topic Strengthening
hollow brick infill wall
plain mortar
steel fiber reinforced mortar
precast reinforced concrete (RC) plate
reinforced concrete (RC) infill wall
seismic performance
description Abstract The aim of this study is to compare the seismic performances of strengthening techniques applied to reinforced concrete (RC) non-ductile frames tested under the effects of seismic loads. In the experimental part of the study, one-third scale, one-bay, two-storey non-ductile hollow brick infilled RC frames were strengthened with five different techniques and tested under reversed cyclic lateral loads. One being reference, five of the frames were infilled with hollow bricks and plastered on both sides, one was strengthened with plain mortar, one was strengthened with steel fiber reinforced mortar, two were strengthened with precast RC plates. The last frame was strengthened with RC infill wall. Strengthening techniques increased strength and stiffnesses of the frames in the ranges from 57% to 189% and from 186% to 486% respectively. In the numerical analysis part, an existing RC non-ductile building located in Istanbul, strengthened with the techniques, were analyzed using a computer program. Numerical results were evaluated in terms of interstorey drift ratio together with the overall seismic performance of the building.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252021000200508
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252021000200508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1679-78256340
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.18 n.2 2021
reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron:ABCM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron_str ABCM
institution ABCM
reponame_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
collection Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv abcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br
_version_ 1754302890750509056