Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdelwahed,B.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252019000700504
Resumo: Abstract This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints at the corner panel after a ground corner column loss scenario. The ductility of a frame is dependent on the ductility of its components, particularly its joints. Deficiency in joints performance can be related to an unexpected event. For example, the removal of a ground corner column turns the joint above into an inverted knee joint, and also inverses the direction of the resulted bending moments in the adjacent exterior and interior joints. Throughout this work, the effects of these changes are evaluated numerically using different modeling techniques considering both seismic and non-seismic reinforcement details. Numerical simulations of standard and sub-standard joints that were verified against experimentally tested joints are also presented. Joint macro models are developed using the OpenSees platform. These numerical models are then used to simulate the substandard beam-column joints appearing in RC frames after ground corner column removal. Moreover, strut and tie models (STMs) were developed for a substandard knee joint to validate the obtained numerical results. The application of the developed numerical models allows to identify the evolution of a joint’s capacity in function of its reinforcement detailing. The analysis shows the suitability of seismic detailing for exterior and interior joints and also a decrease in the inverted knee joint resistance and this can be recovered by adding i) more confinement to the joint panel zone or ii) joint vertical stirrups. An increase in the degree of confidence in the numerical results is achieved by reproduce similar behavior using different analysis methods.
id ABCM-1_424d3fdcb3c65533a390929ff7e9359c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-78252019000700504
network_acronym_str ABCM-1
network_name_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical AnalysisRC jointProgressive collapseFlexural resistanceNumerical simulationReinforcement detailsMacro modelAbstract This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints at the corner panel after a ground corner column loss scenario. The ductility of a frame is dependent on the ductility of its components, particularly its joints. Deficiency in joints performance can be related to an unexpected event. For example, the removal of a ground corner column turns the joint above into an inverted knee joint, and also inverses the direction of the resulted bending moments in the adjacent exterior and interior joints. Throughout this work, the effects of these changes are evaluated numerically using different modeling techniques considering both seismic and non-seismic reinforcement details. Numerical simulations of standard and sub-standard joints that were verified against experimentally tested joints are also presented. Joint macro models are developed using the OpenSees platform. These numerical models are then used to simulate the substandard beam-column joints appearing in RC frames after ground corner column removal. Moreover, strut and tie models (STMs) were developed for a substandard knee joint to validate the obtained numerical results. The application of the developed numerical models allows to identify the evolution of a joint’s capacity in function of its reinforcement detailing. The analysis shows the suitability of seismic detailing for exterior and interior joints and also a decrease in the inverted knee joint resistance and this can be recovered by adding i) more confinement to the joint panel zone or ii) joint vertical stirrups. An increase in the degree of confidence in the numerical results is achieved by reproduce similar behavior using different analysis methods.Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252019000700504Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.16 n.7 2019reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)instacron:ABCM10.1590/1679-78255536info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdelwahed,B.eng2019-08-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-78252019000700504Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1679-7825&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br1679-78251679-7817opendoar:2019-08-13T00:00Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
title Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
spellingShingle Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
Abdelwahed,B.
RC joint
Progressive collapse
Flexural resistance
Numerical simulation
Reinforcement details
Macro model
title_short Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
title_full Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
title_fullStr Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
title_sort Beam-Column Joints Reinforcement Detailing Adequacy in Case of a Corner Column Loss-Numerical Analysis
author Abdelwahed,B.
author_facet Abdelwahed,B.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdelwahed,B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv RC joint
Progressive collapse
Flexural resistance
Numerical simulation
Reinforcement details
Macro model
topic RC joint
Progressive collapse
Flexural resistance
Numerical simulation
Reinforcement details
Macro model
description Abstract This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints at the corner panel after a ground corner column loss scenario. The ductility of a frame is dependent on the ductility of its components, particularly its joints. Deficiency in joints performance can be related to an unexpected event. For example, the removal of a ground corner column turns the joint above into an inverted knee joint, and also inverses the direction of the resulted bending moments in the adjacent exterior and interior joints. Throughout this work, the effects of these changes are evaluated numerically using different modeling techniques considering both seismic and non-seismic reinforcement details. Numerical simulations of standard and sub-standard joints that were verified against experimentally tested joints are also presented. Joint macro models are developed using the OpenSees platform. These numerical models are then used to simulate the substandard beam-column joints appearing in RC frames after ground corner column removal. Moreover, strut and tie models (STMs) were developed for a substandard knee joint to validate the obtained numerical results. The application of the developed numerical models allows to identify the evolution of a joint’s capacity in function of its reinforcement detailing. The analysis shows the suitability of seismic detailing for exterior and interior joints and also a decrease in the inverted knee joint resistance and this can be recovered by adding i) more confinement to the joint panel zone or ii) joint vertical stirrups. An increase in the degree of confidence in the numerical results is achieved by reproduce similar behavior using different analysis methods.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252019000700504
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252019000700504
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1679-78255536
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.16 n.7 2019
reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron:ABCM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron_str ABCM
institution ABCM
reponame_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
collection Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv abcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br
_version_ 1754302890077323264