Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Ricardo J. C.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Oliveira,Dênio R. C., Albuquerque,Nívea G. B., Silva Júnior,Francisco E. S., Sacramento,Paulo V. P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252020000600502
Resumo: Abstract A greater number of structures are being built with flat reinforced concrete slabs because they offer several advantages. However, many designers are still unsure about the type of slab that has the best structural performance and which building codes provide the best strength estimates. This study presents nonlinear computer simulations of 16 flat reinforced concrete slabs under symmetrical punching: 4 solid slabs, 4 waffle slabs with wide beams, and 8 waffle slabs with different numbers of ribs supported in the solid area of the slab. Geometric longitudinal reinforcement ratios ranged from 0.45% to 1.97%. The results showed that solid and beamed slabs are more resistant, and normative estimates overestimate their strengths, while the opposite outcome was found for waffle slabs, whose estimates provided in the codes were rather conservative. The most accurate code was EC2, followed by ACI 318 and NBR 6118.
id ABCM-1_9b71601e36d7e3f172bf9d912cff5cfd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-78252020000600502
network_acronym_str ABCM-1
network_name_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strengthPunchingFlat waffle slabWide beamAbstract A greater number of structures are being built with flat reinforced concrete slabs because they offer several advantages. However, many designers are still unsure about the type of slab that has the best structural performance and which building codes provide the best strength estimates. This study presents nonlinear computer simulations of 16 flat reinforced concrete slabs under symmetrical punching: 4 solid slabs, 4 waffle slabs with wide beams, and 8 waffle slabs with different numbers of ribs supported in the solid area of the slab. Geometric longitudinal reinforcement ratios ranged from 0.45% to 1.97%. The results showed that solid and beamed slabs are more resistant, and normative estimates overestimate their strengths, while the opposite outcome was found for waffle slabs, whose estimates provided in the codes were rather conservative. The most accurate code was EC2, followed by ACI 318 and NBR 6118.Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252020000600502Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.17 n.6 2020reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)instacron:ABCM10.1590/1679-78256128info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Ricardo J. C.Oliveira,Dênio R. C.Albuquerque,Nívea G. B.Silva Júnior,Francisco E. S.Sacramento,Paulo V. P.eng2020-08-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-78252020000600502Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1679-7825&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br1679-78251679-7817opendoar:2020-08-20T00:00Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
title Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
spellingShingle Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
Silva,Ricardo J. C.
Punching
Flat waffle slab
Wide beam
title_short Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
title_full Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
title_fullStr Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
title_full_unstemmed Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
title_sort Computational modeling of flat slabs: Influence of ribs and flexural reinforcement on shear strength
author Silva,Ricardo J. C.
author_facet Silva,Ricardo J. C.
Oliveira,Dênio R. C.
Albuquerque,Nívea G. B.
Silva Júnior,Francisco E. S.
Sacramento,Paulo V. P.
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Dênio R. C.
Albuquerque,Nívea G. B.
Silva Júnior,Francisco E. S.
Sacramento,Paulo V. P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Ricardo J. C.
Oliveira,Dênio R. C.
Albuquerque,Nívea G. B.
Silva Júnior,Francisco E. S.
Sacramento,Paulo V. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Punching
Flat waffle slab
Wide beam
topic Punching
Flat waffle slab
Wide beam
description Abstract A greater number of structures are being built with flat reinforced concrete slabs because they offer several advantages. However, many designers are still unsure about the type of slab that has the best structural performance and which building codes provide the best strength estimates. This study presents nonlinear computer simulations of 16 flat reinforced concrete slabs under symmetrical punching: 4 solid slabs, 4 waffle slabs with wide beams, and 8 waffle slabs with different numbers of ribs supported in the solid area of the slab. Geometric longitudinal reinforcement ratios ranged from 0.45% to 1.97%. The results showed that solid and beamed slabs are more resistant, and normative estimates overestimate their strengths, while the opposite outcome was found for waffle slabs, whose estimates provided in the codes were rather conservative. The most accurate code was EC2, followed by ACI 318 and NBR 6118.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252020000600502
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252020000600502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1679-78256128
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.17 n.6 2020
reponame:Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron:ABCM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron_str ABCM
institution ABCM
reponame_str Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
collection Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Latin American journal of solids and structures (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv abcm@abcm.org.br||maralves@usp.br
_version_ 1754302890432790528