Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maciel,Edisson Sávio de Góes
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782007000400011
Resumo: The present work studies upwind schemes applied to the solution of aeronautical and aerospace problems. The Harten, the Frink, Parikh and Pirzadeh, the Liou and Steffen and the Radespiel and Kroll algorithms, all first order accurate in space, are studied. The Euler equations in conservative form, employing a finite volume formulation and a structured spatial discretization, in the two-dimensional space, are solved. A time splitting method and a Runge-Kutta method of five stages are used to perform the time march of the numerical schemes. The steady state physical problems of the supersonic flow along a ramp and around a blunt body configuration are studied. All algorithms are accelerated to the steady state solution using a spatially variable time step. This technique has proved excellent gains in terms of convergence ratio as reported in Maciel. The results have demonstrated that the Liou and Steffen scheme has presented the most critical solutions, in both example-cases, in relation to the others schemes and a more accurate solution, in terms of the determination of the stagnation pressure in the blunt body case, than the Harten and the Radespiel and Kroll schemes. In the ramp problem, the Harten scheme predicts the best pressure distribution along the ramp wall in comparison with theoretical results. In the blunt body problem, the Liou and Steffen scheme presents the highest value of Cp at the configuration nose in relation to the other schemes. Values of cL and cD have been accurately predicted by all schemes, except by the Harten scheme.
id ABCM-2_5cf9c1dcbb31df724839f50519fcc205
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-58782007000400011
network_acronym_str ABCM-2
network_name_str Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensionsHarten schemeFrinkParikh and Pirzadeh schemeLiou and Steffen schemeRadespiel and Kroll schemeEuler equationsThe present work studies upwind schemes applied to the solution of aeronautical and aerospace problems. The Harten, the Frink, Parikh and Pirzadeh, the Liou and Steffen and the Radespiel and Kroll algorithms, all first order accurate in space, are studied. The Euler equations in conservative form, employing a finite volume formulation and a structured spatial discretization, in the two-dimensional space, are solved. A time splitting method and a Runge-Kutta method of five stages are used to perform the time march of the numerical schemes. The steady state physical problems of the supersonic flow along a ramp and around a blunt body configuration are studied. All algorithms are accelerated to the steady state solution using a spatially variable time step. This technique has proved excellent gains in terms of convergence ratio as reported in Maciel. The results have demonstrated that the Liou and Steffen scheme has presented the most critical solutions, in both example-cases, in relation to the others schemes and a more accurate solution, in terms of the determination of the stagnation pressure in the blunt body case, than the Harten and the Radespiel and Kroll schemes. In the ramp problem, the Harten scheme predicts the best pressure distribution along the ramp wall in comparison with theoretical results. In the blunt body problem, the Liou and Steffen scheme presents the highest value of Cp at the configuration nose in relation to the other schemes. Values of cL and cD have been accurately predicted by all schemes, except by the Harten scheme.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM2007-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782007000400011Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering v.29 n.4 2007reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)instacron:ABCM10.1590/S1678-58782007000400011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaciel,Edisson Sávio de Góeseng2008-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-58782007000400011Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/jbsmse/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||abcm@abcm.org.br1806-36911678-5878opendoar:2008-04-07T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
title Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
spellingShingle Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
Maciel,Edisson Sávio de Góes
Harten scheme
Frink
Parikh and Pirzadeh scheme
Liou and Steffen scheme
Radespiel and Kroll scheme
Euler equations
title_short Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
title_full Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
title_fullStr Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
title_sort Comparison among structured first order algorithms in the solution of the euler equations in two-dimensions
author Maciel,Edisson Sávio de Góes
author_facet Maciel,Edisson Sávio de Góes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maciel,Edisson Sávio de Góes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Harten scheme
Frink
Parikh and Pirzadeh scheme
Liou and Steffen scheme
Radespiel and Kroll scheme
Euler equations
topic Harten scheme
Frink
Parikh and Pirzadeh scheme
Liou and Steffen scheme
Radespiel and Kroll scheme
Euler equations
description The present work studies upwind schemes applied to the solution of aeronautical and aerospace problems. The Harten, the Frink, Parikh and Pirzadeh, the Liou and Steffen and the Radespiel and Kroll algorithms, all first order accurate in space, are studied. The Euler equations in conservative form, employing a finite volume formulation and a structured spatial discretization, in the two-dimensional space, are solved. A time splitting method and a Runge-Kutta method of five stages are used to perform the time march of the numerical schemes. The steady state physical problems of the supersonic flow along a ramp and around a blunt body configuration are studied. All algorithms are accelerated to the steady state solution using a spatially variable time step. This technique has proved excellent gains in terms of convergence ratio as reported in Maciel. The results have demonstrated that the Liou and Steffen scheme has presented the most critical solutions, in both example-cases, in relation to the others schemes and a more accurate solution, in terms of the determination of the stagnation pressure in the blunt body case, than the Harten and the Radespiel and Kroll schemes. In the ramp problem, the Harten scheme predicts the best pressure distribution along the ramp wall in comparison with theoretical results. In the blunt body problem, the Liou and Steffen scheme presents the highest value of Cp at the configuration nose in relation to the other schemes. Values of cL and cD have been accurately predicted by all schemes, except by the Harten scheme.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782007000400011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782007000400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-58782007000400011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering v.29 n.4 2007
reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron:ABCM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron_str ABCM
institution ABCM
reponame_str Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
collection Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||abcm@abcm.org.br
_version_ 1754734680992645120