Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Okado,Lucas Toshiaki Archangelo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ribeiro,Ednaldo Aparecido
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300201
Resumo: Theories about political protest point to three sets of variables responsible for promoting engagement in such actions: resources, grievance and values. There is consensus on the importance of resources, but the influence of grievance and values remain inconclusive. Discontent alone is not enough to motivate protest, but in societies at intermediate levels of development, grievance could be an explanatory variable. By contrast, values would have a limited effect, given that value change in developing countries could only be incipient. In view of the new cycle of protest in the region and wishing to contribute to the debate on the subject, we aim to discover what the relationship is between these three sets of variables as regards Latin Americans’ predisposition to protest. Given that these countries find themselves at an intermediate level of economic and social development, it would seem that the primary motivation for protest is discontent, as under such circumstances the relative scarcity of resources presents little obstacle to mobilization. On the other hand, as the societies in question are not advanced industrial societies, the associated low dispersion of emancipatory values would exercise limited effect. To test these hypotheses, we looked at data from the sixth wave of the World Values Survey with reference to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. The results suggested that grievance was irrelevant as an explanatory factor. Participation in protests in the region is determined by the mobilization of resources and values.
id ABCP-1_0722672d5c53696e8376e8461d9370e5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300201
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and ResourcesLatin Americapolitical protestpolitical behavioremancipatory valuesdiscontentTheories about political protest point to three sets of variables responsible for promoting engagement in such actions: resources, grievance and values. There is consensus on the importance of resources, but the influence of grievance and values remain inconclusive. Discontent alone is not enough to motivate protest, but in societies at intermediate levels of development, grievance could be an explanatory variable. By contrast, values would have a limited effect, given that value change in developing countries could only be incipient. In view of the new cycle of protest in the region and wishing to contribute to the debate on the subject, we aim to discover what the relationship is between these three sets of variables as regards Latin Americans’ predisposition to protest. Given that these countries find themselves at an intermediate level of economic and social development, it would seem that the primary motivation for protest is discontent, as under such circumstances the relative scarcity of resources presents little obstacle to mobilization. On the other hand, as the societies in question are not advanced industrial societies, the associated low dispersion of emancipatory values would exercise limited effect. To test these hypotheses, we looked at data from the sixth wave of the World Values Survey with reference to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. The results suggested that grievance was irrelevant as an explanatory factor. Participation in protests in the region is determined by the mobilization of resources and values.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300201Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821202000030002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOkado,Lucas Toshiaki ArchangeloRibeiro,Ednaldo Aparecidoeng2020-09-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212020000300201Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2020-09-22T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
title Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
spellingShingle Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
Okado,Lucas Toshiaki Archangelo
Latin America
political protest
political behavior
emancipatory values
discontent
title_short Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
title_full Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
title_fullStr Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
title_full_unstemmed Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
title_sort Individual Conditioning Factors of Political Protest in Latin America: Effects of Values, Grievance and Resources
author Okado,Lucas Toshiaki Archangelo
author_facet Okado,Lucas Toshiaki Archangelo
Ribeiro,Ednaldo Aparecido
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro,Ednaldo Aparecido
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Okado,Lucas Toshiaki Archangelo
Ribeiro,Ednaldo Aparecido
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Latin America
political protest
political behavior
emancipatory values
discontent
topic Latin America
political protest
political behavior
emancipatory values
discontent
description Theories about political protest point to three sets of variables responsible for promoting engagement in such actions: resources, grievance and values. There is consensus on the importance of resources, but the influence of grievance and values remain inconclusive. Discontent alone is not enough to motivate protest, but in societies at intermediate levels of development, grievance could be an explanatory variable. By contrast, values would have a limited effect, given that value change in developing countries could only be incipient. In view of the new cycle of protest in the region and wishing to contribute to the debate on the subject, we aim to discover what the relationship is between these three sets of variables as regards Latin Americans’ predisposition to protest. Given that these countries find themselves at an intermediate level of economic and social development, it would seem that the primary motivation for protest is discontent, as under such circumstances the relative scarcity of resources presents little obstacle to mobilization. On the other hand, as the societies in question are not advanced industrial societies, the associated low dispersion of emancipatory values would exercise limited effect. To test these hypotheses, we looked at data from the sixth wave of the World Values Survey with reference to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. The results suggested that grievance was irrelevant as an explanatory factor. Participation in protests in the region is determined by the mobilization of resources and values.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000300201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821202000030002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.3 2020
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908275359744