Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montenegro,Renan Holanda
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Mesquita,Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201
Resumo: The so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China.
id ABCP-1_1161c5aa67dcf3df4046680ce9f68a30
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212017000200201
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General AssemblyBRICSemerging powersregional leadershipUN general assemblyThe so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.2 2017reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201700020005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontenegro,Renan HolandaMesquita,Rafaeleng2017-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212017000200201Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2017-06-01T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
title Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
spellingShingle Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
Montenegro,Renan Holanda
BRICS
emerging powers
regional leadership
UN general assembly
title_short Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
title_full Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
title_fullStr Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
title_full_unstemmed Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
title_sort Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
author Montenegro,Renan Holanda
author_facet Montenegro,Renan Holanda
Mesquita,Rafael
author_role author
author2 Mesquita,Rafael
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montenegro,Renan Holanda
Mesquita,Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BRICS
emerging powers
regional leadership
UN general assembly
topic BRICS
emerging powers
regional leadership
UN general assembly
description The so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821201700020005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.2 2017
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908167356416