Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201 |
Resumo: | The so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China. |
id |
ABCP-1_1161c5aa67dcf3df4046680ce9f68a30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212017000200201 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General AssemblyBRICSemerging powersregional leadershipUN general assemblyThe so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.2 2017reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201700020005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontenegro,Renan HolandaMesquita,Rafaeleng2017-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212017000200201Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2017-06-01T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
title |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
spellingShingle |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly Montenegro,Renan Holanda BRICS emerging powers regional leadership UN general assembly |
title_short |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
title_full |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
title_fullStr |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
title_full_unstemmed |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
title_sort |
Leaders or Loners? How Do the BRICS Countries and their Regions Vote in the UN General Assembly |
author |
Montenegro,Renan Holanda |
author_facet |
Montenegro,Renan Holanda Mesquita,Rafael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mesquita,Rafael |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montenegro,Renan Holanda Mesquita,Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BRICS emerging powers regional leadership UN general assembly |
topic |
BRICS emerging powers regional leadership UN general assembly |
description |
The so-called emerging powers, including the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), typically present themselves as natural leaders of their regions. Although physical size confers them the status of regional powers, their role as leaders depends on the consensual acceptance of their would-be followers. Can it be affirmed then that the countries under the influence of the BRICS show convergent positions? Can the five BRICS be considered de facto leaders of their regions? This article sets out to answer these questions by analysing the behaviour of the BRICS and their regional partners in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The research design replicates the data from Voeten (2013) in order to compare the average affinity between each of the BRICS countries and their regions in the votes of the UNGA from 1992 to 2014. The data indicate a high level of regional cohesion for Brazil, China and South Africa when compared to Russia and India. The findings corroborate the literature in relation to Brazil and South Africa but conflict with what has been produced on the regional leadership of Russia, India and China. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000200201 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-3821201700020005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.2 2017 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302908167356416 |