Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kenkel,Kai Michael
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Martins,Marcelle Trote
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203
Resumo: The rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force.
id ABCP-1_13c4a92213cd52ad2b7e2bb36d828f6f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212016000100203
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?Responsibilityinterventionpolitical philosophyemerging powersBrazilR2PThe rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-38212016000100003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKenkel,Kai MichaelMartins,Marcelle Troteeng2016-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212016000100203Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2016-03-28T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
title Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
spellingShingle Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
Kenkel,Kai Michael
Responsibility
intervention
political philosophy
emerging powers
Brazil
R2P
title_short Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
title_full Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
title_fullStr Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
title_full_unstemmed Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
title_sort Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
author Kenkel,Kai Michael
author_facet Kenkel,Kai Michael
Martins,Marcelle Trote
author_role author
author2 Martins,Marcelle Trote
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kenkel,Kai Michael
Martins,Marcelle Trote
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Responsibility
intervention
political philosophy
emerging powers
Brazil
R2P
topic Responsibility
intervention
political philosophy
emerging powers
Brazil
R2P
description The rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-38212016000100003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.1 2016
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302907911503872