Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203 |
Resumo: | The rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force. |
id |
ABCP-1_13c4a92213cd52ad2b7e2bb36d828f6f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212016000100203 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost?Responsibilityinterventionpolitical philosophyemerging powersBrazilR2PThe rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-38212016000100003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKenkel,Kai MichaelMartins,Marcelle Troteeng2016-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212016000100203Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2016-03-28T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
title |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
spellingShingle |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? Kenkel,Kai Michael Responsibility intervention political philosophy emerging powers Brazil R2P |
title_short |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
title_full |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
title_fullStr |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
title_sort |
Emerging Powers and the Notion of International Responsibility: moral duty or shifting goalpost? |
author |
Kenkel,Kai Michael |
author_facet |
Kenkel,Kai Michael Martins,Marcelle Trote |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins,Marcelle Trote |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kenkel,Kai Michael Martins,Marcelle Trote |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Responsibility intervention political philosophy emerging powers Brazil R2P |
topic |
Responsibility intervention political philosophy emerging powers Brazil R2P |
description |
The rise of new powers and attendant shifts in the global balance of power have led to calls for UN Security Council reform. Established powers have often responded by linking increased influence in the international system with the assumption of more international responsibility by aspirant powers. Based on ethical and philosophical approaches from the individual and state levels, and a case study of Brazil, this article analyses the way in which the notion of responsibility is discursively constructed, demonstrating the manner in which it has been used as an ever-shifting goalpost to deny emerging powers participation at the highest levels of global strategic decision-making. Most often, this is done by equating “responsibility” with the ability and willingness to use robust military force. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212016000100203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-38212016000100003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.10 n.1 2016 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302907911503872 |