‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100206 |
Resumo: | Adopting a postcolonial perspective, this article approaches Brazilian South-South cooperation ‘narratives’ in Africa as part of a politics of identity that helps redefine Brazil’s place in the modern world. The article discusses how South-South cooperation operates as a site of knowledge and power through which a developmentalist Brazilian identity is reproduced and subalternity can be constantly renegotiated. Through a brief analysis of the narratives of Brazilian involvement in Angola, it emphasizes how the production of the state self is also permeated by several ambivalences that update colonial tropes and bring new forms of subjugation. If, on the one hand, the movement undertaken in the article permits discussing the very ambiguity of the postcolonial condition – mainly by exposing the tensions and indeterminacies that permeate Brazil’s engagements in the global arena – on the other hand, it opens up new theoretical avenues for analyzing Brazilian foreign policy. |
id |
ABCP-1_17b584cc6b4eea928802143883b9243d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100206 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in AngolaBrazilSouth-South cooperation narrativespostcolonial theoryidentityambivalencesAfricaAngolaAdopting a postcolonial perspective, this article approaches Brazilian South-South cooperation ‘narratives’ in Africa as part of a politics of identity that helps redefine Brazil’s place in the modern world. The article discusses how South-South cooperation operates as a site of knowledge and power through which a developmentalist Brazilian identity is reproduced and subalternity can be constantly renegotiated. Through a brief analysis of the narratives of Brazilian involvement in Angola, it emphasizes how the production of the state self is also permeated by several ambivalences that update colonial tropes and bring new forms of subjugation. If, on the one hand, the movement undertaken in the article permits discussing the very ambiguity of the postcolonial condition – mainly by exposing the tensions and indeterminacies that permeate Brazil’s engagements in the global arena – on the other hand, it opens up new theoretical avenues for analyzing Brazilian foreign policy.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100206Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201900010007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Camila dosSiman,MaíraFernández,Martaeng2019-06-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100206Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2019-06-06T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
title |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
spellingShingle |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola Santos,Camila dos Brazil South-South cooperation narratives postcolonial theory identity ambivalences Africa Angola |
title_short |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
title_full |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
title_fullStr |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
title_sort |
‘Two Brazils’: Renegotiating Subalternity Through South-South Cooperation in Angola |
author |
Santos,Camila dos |
author_facet |
Santos,Camila dos Siman,Maíra Fernández,Marta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siman,Maíra Fernández,Marta |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Camila dos Siman,Maíra Fernández,Marta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazil South-South cooperation narratives postcolonial theory identity ambivalences Africa Angola |
topic |
Brazil South-South cooperation narratives postcolonial theory identity ambivalences Africa Angola |
description |
Adopting a postcolonial perspective, this article approaches Brazilian South-South cooperation ‘narratives’ in Africa as part of a politics of identity that helps redefine Brazil’s place in the modern world. The article discusses how South-South cooperation operates as a site of knowledge and power through which a developmentalist Brazilian identity is reproduced and subalternity can be constantly renegotiated. Through a brief analysis of the narratives of Brazilian involvement in Angola, it emphasizes how the production of the state self is also permeated by several ambivalences that update colonial tropes and bring new forms of subjugation. If, on the one hand, the movement undertaken in the article permits discussing the very ambiguity of the postcolonial condition – mainly by exposing the tensions and indeterminacies that permeate Brazil’s engagements in the global arena – on the other hand, it opens up new theoretical avenues for analyzing Brazilian foreign policy. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100206 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-3821201900010007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302908230270976 |