The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212014000300039 |
Resumo: | This article offers an analysis of the polemic between neo-republicanism and Isaiah Berlin on the concept of liberty. Neo-republican theory argues that Berlin's concept of liberty allows arbitrary power to emerge, and that the characteristically negative association between intervention and liberty in his argument should be dispelled. This article points out that the concept of liberty in Berlin does not preclude intervention to prevent oppression. One theme present in Berlin's argument is that interference by Law is an instrument that assures the exercise of both negative and positive liberty. Taking as its point of departure the ideas of negative liberty and positive liberty, the article argues that, on the basis of Berlin's work, these notions are facets of a broader concept that involves primarily the freedom to choose among alternatives. It highlights the fact that the two lines of thought converge in seeing the exercise of freedom as subject to no ultimate ends. |
id |
ABCP-1_c47188a76e71268ed2f3a0044da41046 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212014000300039 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah BerlinLibertyIsaiah Berlinneo-republicanismnegative libertypositive libertyThis article offers an analysis of the polemic between neo-republicanism and Isaiah Berlin on the concept of liberty. Neo-republican theory argues that Berlin's concept of liberty allows arbitrary power to emerge, and that the characteristically negative association between intervention and liberty in his argument should be dispelled. This article points out that the concept of liberty in Berlin does not preclude intervention to prevent oppression. One theme present in Berlin's argument is that interference by Law is an instrument that assures the exercise of both negative and positive liberty. Taking as its point of departure the ideas of negative liberty and positive liberty, the article argues that, on the basis of Berlin's work, these notions are facets of a broader concept that involves primarily the freedom to choose among alternatives. It highlights the fact that the two lines of thought converge in seeing the exercise of freedom as subject to no ultimate ends.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212014000300039Brazilian Political Science Review v.8 n.3 2014reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-38212014000100020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoser,Ivoeng2014-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212014000300039Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2014-11-28T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
title |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
spellingShingle |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin Coser,Ivo Liberty Isaiah Berlin neo-republicanism negative liberty positive liberty |
title_short |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
title_full |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
title_fullStr |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
title_sort |
The Concept of Liberty: the Polemic between the Neo-Republicans and Isaiah Berlin |
author |
Coser,Ivo |
author_facet |
Coser,Ivo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coser,Ivo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Liberty Isaiah Berlin neo-republicanism negative liberty positive liberty |
topic |
Liberty Isaiah Berlin neo-republicanism negative liberty positive liberty |
description |
This article offers an analysis of the polemic between neo-republicanism and Isaiah Berlin on the concept of liberty. Neo-republican theory argues that Berlin's concept of liberty allows arbitrary power to emerge, and that the characteristically negative association between intervention and liberty in his argument should be dispelled. This article points out that the concept of liberty in Berlin does not preclude intervention to prevent oppression. One theme present in Berlin's argument is that interference by Law is an instrument that assures the exercise of both negative and positive liberty. Taking as its point of departure the ideas of negative liberty and positive liberty, the article argues that, on the basis of Berlin's work, these notions are facets of a broader concept that involves primarily the freedom to choose among alternatives. It highlights the fact that the two lines of thought converge in seeing the exercise of freedom as subject to no ultimate ends. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212014000300039 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212014000300039 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-38212014000100020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.8 n.3 2014 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302907874803712 |