Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2016000700704 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid EBM Reviews, and PubMed was performed for English-language literature about laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), in September 2014. The papers were filtered using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight papers were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The sample comprised a pooled total of 370 patients, of which 210 and 160 patients took PPIs and placebo, respectively. The difference between PPIs and placebo groups in overall improvement of symptoms in adult patients with LPR was not statistically significant (RR=1.22; 95%CI=0.93-1.58; P=0.149). The difference in cough improvement was also not significant between PPIs and placebo groups (RR=0.65; 95%CI=0.30-1.41; P=0.279). |
id |
ABDC-1_1670905f9282c87eb35506464eb5fdab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-879X2016000700704 |
network_acronym_str |
ABDC-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal refluxGastroesophageal reflux diseaseAdultProton pump inhibitorsMeta-analysisThe objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid EBM Reviews, and PubMed was performed for English-language literature about laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), in September 2014. The papers were filtered using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight papers were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The sample comprised a pooled total of 370 patients, of which 210 and 160 patients took PPIs and placebo, respectively. The difference between PPIs and placebo groups in overall improvement of symptoms in adult patients with LPR was not statistically significant (RR=1.22; 95%CI=0.93-1.58; P=0.149). The difference in cough improvement was also not significant between PPIs and placebo groups (RR=0.65; 95%CI=0.30-1.41; P=0.279).Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2016000700704Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.49 n.7 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/1414-431x20165149info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiu,C.Wang,H.Liu,K.eng2019-03-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2016000700704Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2019-03-19T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
title |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
spellingShingle |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux Liu,C. Gastroesophageal reflux disease Adult Proton pump inhibitors Meta-analysis |
title_short |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
title_full |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
title_fullStr |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
title_sort |
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux |
author |
Liu,C. |
author_facet |
Liu,C. Wang,H. Liu,K. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wang,H. Liu,K. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Liu,C. Wang,H. Liu,K. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gastroesophageal reflux disease Adult Proton pump inhibitors Meta-analysis |
topic |
Gastroesophageal reflux disease Adult Proton pump inhibitors Meta-analysis |
description |
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid EBM Reviews, and PubMed was performed for English-language literature about laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), in September 2014. The papers were filtered using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight papers were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The sample comprised a pooled total of 370 patients, of which 210 and 160 patients took PPIs and placebo, respectively. The difference between PPIs and placebo groups in overall improvement of symptoms in adult patients with LPR was not statistically significant (RR=1.22; 95%CI=0.93-1.58; P=0.149). The difference in cough improvement was also not significant between PPIs and placebo groups (RR=0.65; 95%CI=0.30-1.41; P=0.279). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2016000700704 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2016000700704 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1414-431x20165149 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.49 n.7 2016 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) instacron:ABDC |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
instacron_str |
ABDC |
institution |
ABDC |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754302945045774336 |