Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2002000400002 |
Resumo: | More precise and rapid diagnostic methods for American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) are necessary because of the growing number of cases observed in Brazil, including the northeastern region of the State of São Paulo. We applied PCR to 54 skin or mucosal biopsies from patients with a clinical and/or laboratory diagnosis of ACL using primers 13A and 13B, with positive results being obtained for 82% of the samples. When the PCR results were compared to those of histopathological leishmania detection, PCR showed superior results with 81.5% sensitivity and 95% CI of 68.0-95.1%. The Montenegro skin test (MST) was positive in 88.7% of patients. Since MST cannot be used as a diagnostic tool in endemic areas, the present results strongly suggest the use of PCR for the etiological confirmation of ACL, with emphasis on the mucosal form. |
id |
ABDC-1_52a37df7fbf9f0e5a0e63f0458f0bb7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-879X2002000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
ABDC-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasisLeishmaniasisCutaneous leishmaniasisPCRHistopathological detectionLeishmania detectionMore precise and rapid diagnostic methods for American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) are necessary because of the growing number of cases observed in Brazil, including the northeastern region of the State of São Paulo. We applied PCR to 54 skin or mucosal biopsies from patients with a clinical and/or laboratory diagnosis of ACL using primers 13A and 13B, with positive results being obtained for 82% of the samples. When the PCR results were compared to those of histopathological leishmania detection, PCR showed superior results with 81.5% sensitivity and 95% CI of 68.0-95.1%. The Montenegro skin test (MST) was positive in 88.7% of patients. Since MST cannot be used as a diagnostic tool in endemic areas, the present results strongly suggest the use of PCR for the etiological confirmation of ACL, with emphasis on the mucosal form.Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2002-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2002000400002Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.35 n.4 2002reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/S0100-879X2002000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedeiros,A.C.R.Rodrigues,S.S.Roselino,A.M.F.eng2002-04-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2002000400002Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2002-04-09T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis Medeiros,A.C.R. Leishmaniasis Cutaneous leishmaniasis PCR Histopathological detection Leishmania detection |
title_short |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_full |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
title_sort |
Comparison of the specificity of PCR and the histopathological detection of leishmania for the diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis |
author |
Medeiros,A.C.R. |
author_facet |
Medeiros,A.C.R. Rodrigues,S.S. Roselino,A.M.F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues,S.S. Roselino,A.M.F. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros,A.C.R. Rodrigues,S.S. Roselino,A.M.F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Leishmaniasis Cutaneous leishmaniasis PCR Histopathological detection Leishmania detection |
topic |
Leishmaniasis Cutaneous leishmaniasis PCR Histopathological detection Leishmania detection |
description |
More precise and rapid diagnostic methods for American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) are necessary because of the growing number of cases observed in Brazil, including the northeastern region of the State of São Paulo. We applied PCR to 54 skin or mucosal biopsies from patients with a clinical and/or laboratory diagnosis of ACL using primers 13A and 13B, with positive results being obtained for 82% of the samples. When the PCR results were compared to those of histopathological leishmania detection, PCR showed superior results with 81.5% sensitivity and 95% CI of 68.0-95.1%. The Montenegro skin test (MST) was positive in 88.7% of patients. Since MST cannot be used as a diagnostic tool in endemic areas, the present results strongly suggest the use of PCR for the etiological confirmation of ACL, with emphasis on the mucosal form. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2002000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2002000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-879X2002000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.35 n.4 2002 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) instacron:ABDC |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
instacron_str |
ABDC |
institution |
ABDC |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754302931661750272 |