Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Atta,J.A.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Nunes,M.P.T., Fonseca-Guedes,C.H.F., Avena,L.A., Borgiani,M.T., Fiorenza,R.F., Martins,M.A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900006
Resumo: We studied the ability of patients not experienced in the use of peak expiratory flow meters to assess the severity of their asthma exacerbations and compared it to the assessment of experienced clinicians. We also evaluated which data of physical examination and medical history are used by physicians to subjectively evaluate the severity of asthma attacks. Fifty-seven adult patients (15 men and 42 women, with a mean (± SD) age of 37.3 ± 14.5 years and 24.0 ± 17.9 years of asthma symptoms) with asthma exacerbations were evaluated in a University Hospital Emergency Department. Patients and physicians independently evaluated the severity of the asthma attack using a linear scale. Patient score, physician score and forced expiratory volume at the first second (FEV1) were correlated with history and physical examination variables, and were also considered as dependent variables in multiple linear regression models. FEV1 correlated significantly with the physician score (rho = 0.42, P = 0.001), but not with patient score (rho = 0.03; P = 0.77). Use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity were the explanatory variables in the FEV1 regression model and were also present in the physician score model. We conclude that physicians evaluate asthma exacerbation severity better than patients and that physician's scoring of asthma severity correlated significantly with objective measures of airway obstruction (FEV1). Some variables (the use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity) persisted as explanatory variables in physician score and FEV1 regression models, and should be emphasized in medical schools and emergency settings.
id ABDC-1_b56e67041e59493f469760277032033f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-879X2004000900006
network_acronym_str ABDC-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository_id_str
spelling Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbationsAsthmaAsthma attackPulmonary function testsDyspneaWe studied the ability of patients not experienced in the use of peak expiratory flow meters to assess the severity of their asthma exacerbations and compared it to the assessment of experienced clinicians. We also evaluated which data of physical examination and medical history are used by physicians to subjectively evaluate the severity of asthma attacks. Fifty-seven adult patients (15 men and 42 women, with a mean (± SD) age of 37.3 ± 14.5 years and 24.0 ± 17.9 years of asthma symptoms) with asthma exacerbations were evaluated in a University Hospital Emergency Department. Patients and physicians independently evaluated the severity of the asthma attack using a linear scale. Patient score, physician score and forced expiratory volume at the first second (FEV1) were correlated with history and physical examination variables, and were also considered as dependent variables in multiple linear regression models. FEV1 correlated significantly with the physician score (rho = 0.42, P = 0.001), but not with patient score (rho = 0.03; P = 0.77). Use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity were the explanatory variables in the FEV1 regression model and were also present in the physician score model. We conclude that physicians evaluate asthma exacerbation severity better than patients and that physician's scoring of asthma severity correlated significantly with objective measures of airway obstruction (FEV1). Some variables (the use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity) persisted as explanatory variables in physician score and FEV1 regression models, and should be emphasized in medical schools and emergency settings.Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2004-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900006Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.37 n.9 2004reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtta,J.A.Nunes,M.P.T.Fonseca-Guedes,C.H.F.Avena,L.A.Borgiani,M.T.Fiorenza,R.F.Martins,M.A.eng2004-09-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2004000900006Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2004-09-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
title Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
spellingShingle Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
Atta,J.A.
Asthma
Asthma attack
Pulmonary function tests
Dyspnea
title_short Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
title_full Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
title_fullStr Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
title_full_unstemmed Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
title_sort Patient and physician evaluation of the severity of acute asthma exacerbations
author Atta,J.A.
author_facet Atta,J.A.
Nunes,M.P.T.
Fonseca-Guedes,C.H.F.
Avena,L.A.
Borgiani,M.T.
Fiorenza,R.F.
Martins,M.A.
author_role author
author2 Nunes,M.P.T.
Fonseca-Guedes,C.H.F.
Avena,L.A.
Borgiani,M.T.
Fiorenza,R.F.
Martins,M.A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Atta,J.A.
Nunes,M.P.T.
Fonseca-Guedes,C.H.F.
Avena,L.A.
Borgiani,M.T.
Fiorenza,R.F.
Martins,M.A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Asthma
Asthma attack
Pulmonary function tests
Dyspnea
topic Asthma
Asthma attack
Pulmonary function tests
Dyspnea
description We studied the ability of patients not experienced in the use of peak expiratory flow meters to assess the severity of their asthma exacerbations and compared it to the assessment of experienced clinicians. We also evaluated which data of physical examination and medical history are used by physicians to subjectively evaluate the severity of asthma attacks. Fifty-seven adult patients (15 men and 42 women, with a mean (± SD) age of 37.3 ± 14.5 years and 24.0 ± 17.9 years of asthma symptoms) with asthma exacerbations were evaluated in a University Hospital Emergency Department. Patients and physicians independently evaluated the severity of the asthma attack using a linear scale. Patient score, physician score and forced expiratory volume at the first second (FEV1) were correlated with history and physical examination variables, and were also considered as dependent variables in multiple linear regression models. FEV1 correlated significantly with the physician score (rho = 0.42, P = 0.001), but not with patient score (rho = 0.03; P = 0.77). Use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity were the explanatory variables in the FEV1 regression model and were also present in the physician score model. We conclude that physicians evaluate asthma exacerbation severity better than patients and that physician's scoring of asthma severity correlated significantly with objective measures of airway obstruction (FEV1). Some variables (the use of neck accessory muscles, expiratory time and wheezing intensity) persisted as explanatory variables in physician score and FEV1 regression models, and should be emphasized in medical schools and emergency settings.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.37 n.9 2004
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron:ABDC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron_str ABDC
institution ABDC
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
collection Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754302933338423296