Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Delvalle,Romulo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santana,Rosimere Ferreira, Menezes,Ariana Kassiadou, Cassiano,Keila Mara, Carvalho,Ana Carolina Siqueira de, Barros,Patrícia de Fátima Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001500163
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: to estimate the mechanical restraint prevalence in Nursing Homes in Brazil and the factors associated with its performance. Methods: this cross-sectional study was carried out in 14 institutions, with a final sample of 443 elderly people. Mechanical restraint was considered as a dependent variable. Results: there was a 7.45% prevalence of mechanical restraint considering bed rails and 3.84% without considering bed rails. Main justification for restraint use was risk of falls (66.7%), and restraint duration was 24 hours (84.8%). The factors associated with the dependent variable were: wandering (p=0.000); MMSE, with cognitive loss (p=0.000); Katz Index, with dependence for Activities of Daily Living (p=0.000); and Alzheimer’s comorbidity (p=0.001) Conclusion: prevalence was lower than international studies, but there was an association with worsening of wandering, dependence, cognitive worsening, and Alzheimer’s Disease, showing the need for alternative interventions to mechanical restraint.
id ABEN-1_2d1ed1dc03147f199628fec19817c803
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672020001500163
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional studyHomes for the AgedRestraint, PhysicalAgedGeriatric NursingHealth of the ElderlyABSTRACT Objective: to estimate the mechanical restraint prevalence in Nursing Homes in Brazil and the factors associated with its performance. Methods: this cross-sectional study was carried out in 14 institutions, with a final sample of 443 elderly people. Mechanical restraint was considered as a dependent variable. Results: there was a 7.45% prevalence of mechanical restraint considering bed rails and 3.84% without considering bed rails. Main justification for restraint use was risk of falls (66.7%), and restraint duration was 24 hours (84.8%). The factors associated with the dependent variable were: wandering (p=0.000); MMSE, with cognitive loss (p=0.000); Katz Index, with dependence for Activities of Daily Living (p=0.000); and Alzheimer’s comorbidity (p=0.001) Conclusion: prevalence was lower than international studies, but there was an association with worsening of wandering, dependence, cognitive worsening, and Alzheimer’s Disease, showing the need for alternative interventions to mechanical restraint.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001500163Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.3 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0509info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDelvalle,RomuloSantana,Rosimere FerreiraMenezes,Ariana KassiadouCassiano,Keila MaraCarvalho,Ana Carolina Siqueira deBarros,Patrícia de Fátima Augustoeng2020-07-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020001500163Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-07-15T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
title Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
Delvalle,Romulo
Homes for the Aged
Restraint, Physical
Aged
Geriatric Nursing
Health of the Elderly
title_short Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
title_full Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Mechanical Restraint in Nursing Homes in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
author Delvalle,Romulo
author_facet Delvalle,Romulo
Santana,Rosimere Ferreira
Menezes,Ariana Kassiadou
Cassiano,Keila Mara
Carvalho,Ana Carolina Siqueira de
Barros,Patrícia de Fátima Augusto
author_role author
author2 Santana,Rosimere Ferreira
Menezes,Ariana Kassiadou
Cassiano,Keila Mara
Carvalho,Ana Carolina Siqueira de
Barros,Patrícia de Fátima Augusto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Delvalle,Romulo
Santana,Rosimere Ferreira
Menezes,Ariana Kassiadou
Cassiano,Keila Mara
Carvalho,Ana Carolina Siqueira de
Barros,Patrícia de Fátima Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Homes for the Aged
Restraint, Physical
Aged
Geriatric Nursing
Health of the Elderly
topic Homes for the Aged
Restraint, Physical
Aged
Geriatric Nursing
Health of the Elderly
description ABSTRACT Objective: to estimate the mechanical restraint prevalence in Nursing Homes in Brazil and the factors associated with its performance. Methods: this cross-sectional study was carried out in 14 institutions, with a final sample of 443 elderly people. Mechanical restraint was considered as a dependent variable. Results: there was a 7.45% prevalence of mechanical restraint considering bed rails and 3.84% without considering bed rails. Main justification for restraint use was risk of falls (66.7%), and restraint duration was 24 hours (84.8%). The factors associated with the dependent variable were: wandering (p=0.000); MMSE, with cognitive loss (p=0.000); Katz Index, with dependence for Activities of Daily Living (p=0.000); and Alzheimer’s comorbidity (p=0.001) Conclusion: prevalence was lower than international studies, but there was an association with worsening of wandering, dependence, cognitive worsening, and Alzheimer’s Disease, showing the need for alternative interventions to mechanical restraint.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001500163
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001500163
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0509
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.3 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303038581899264