Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Somensi,Rute Merlo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Caregnato,Rita Catalina Aquino, Cervi,Gustavo Henrique, Flores,Cecilia Dias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000401850
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To measure nursing Workload (WL) of nurses who work in the Inpatient Unit, as recommended by the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), comparing observational and online methods to propose supervision strategies for academic professionals. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, observational study performed in a Clinical/Surgical Hospital Unit. 30 direct and indirect activities. Data collected in observational and online records. Statistical analysis: SPSS 18.0 software, percentage frequencies and associated times between groups by Fisher's Exact test, 95% confidence interval, significance level 5%. Results: Comparing the activities performed with the NIC time: from the direct 16, five observational and five online, were out of range, with no significant difference between frequencies (P=0.427). Of the 14 indirect, only in the observational, two were out of the range, without significant difference (P=0.486). Conclusion: Both methods measure WL; the online method developed accompanies activities performed in real time.
id ABEN-1_389cb862475caae4157a9dd604c78456
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672018000401850
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methodsWorkloadPersonnel DimensioningNursesQuality of Health CareResource Management of the Health Care TeamABSTRACT Objective: To measure nursing Workload (WL) of nurses who work in the Inpatient Unit, as recommended by the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), comparing observational and online methods to propose supervision strategies for academic professionals. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, observational study performed in a Clinical/Surgical Hospital Unit. 30 direct and indirect activities. Data collected in observational and online records. Statistical analysis: SPSS 18.0 software, percentage frequencies and associated times between groups by Fisher's Exact test, 95% confidence interval, significance level 5%. Results: Comparing the activities performed with the NIC time: from the direct 16, five observational and five online, were out of range, with no significant difference between frequencies (P=0.427). Of the 14 indirect, only in the observational, two were out of the range, without significant difference (P=0.486). Conclusion: Both methods measure WL; the online method developed accompanies activities performed in real time.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000401850Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.4 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0313info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSomensi,Rute MerloCaregnato,Rita Catalina AquinoCervi,Gustavo HenriqueFlores,Cecilia Diaseng2018-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672018000401850Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2018-08-24T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
title Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
spellingShingle Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
Somensi,Rute Merlo
Workload
Personnel Dimensioning
Nurses
Quality of Health Care
Resource Management of the Health Care Team
title_short Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
title_full Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
title_fullStr Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
title_full_unstemmed Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
title_sort Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods
author Somensi,Rute Merlo
author_facet Somensi,Rute Merlo
Caregnato,Rita Catalina Aquino
Cervi,Gustavo Henrique
Flores,Cecilia Dias
author_role author
author2 Caregnato,Rita Catalina Aquino
Cervi,Gustavo Henrique
Flores,Cecilia Dias
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Somensi,Rute Merlo
Caregnato,Rita Catalina Aquino
Cervi,Gustavo Henrique
Flores,Cecilia Dias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Workload
Personnel Dimensioning
Nurses
Quality of Health Care
Resource Management of the Health Care Team
topic Workload
Personnel Dimensioning
Nurses
Quality of Health Care
Resource Management of the Health Care Team
description ABSTRACT Objective: To measure nursing Workload (WL) of nurses who work in the Inpatient Unit, as recommended by the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), comparing observational and online methods to propose supervision strategies for academic professionals. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, observational study performed in a Clinical/Surgical Hospital Unit. 30 direct and indirect activities. Data collected in observational and online records. Statistical analysis: SPSS 18.0 software, percentage frequencies and associated times between groups by Fisher's Exact test, 95% confidence interval, significance level 5%. Results: Comparing the activities performed with the NIC time: from the direct 16, five observational and five online, were out of range, with no significant difference between frequencies (P=0.427). Of the 14 indirect, only in the observational, two were out of the range, without significant difference (P=0.486). Conclusion: Both methods measure WL; the online method developed accompanies activities performed in real time.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000401850
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000401850
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0313
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.4 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303034443169792

Registros relacionados