Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672021000300301 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the microbiological profile of leg ulcers of patients treated at outpatient clinics and hospitals regarding the type of microorganism, microbiological selection of antibiotics, and techniques for the collection of culture material. Methods: literature review performed on LILACS, IBECS, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases, resulting in a descriptive analysis of 27 studies. Results: 35.7% of the studies occurred in an outpatient care scenario; and 64.2% in hospitals. There was a predominance of swab (100%) in outpatient care and biopsy (55.5%) in the hospital. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were more common at both levels of assistance. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in both. Conclusions: the microbiological profile of infections was similar, with the presence of resistant bacteria in both environments. This fact causes concern and raises the need for research to elucidate it. The studies did not compare the effectiveness between biopsy and swab. |
id |
ABEN-1_3a41de4cddbd2f58138ea8726ba192b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672021000300301 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review studyLeg UlcerCulture TechniquesBacterial GrowthInfectionNursingABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the microbiological profile of leg ulcers of patients treated at outpatient clinics and hospitals regarding the type of microorganism, microbiological selection of antibiotics, and techniques for the collection of culture material. Methods: literature review performed on LILACS, IBECS, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases, resulting in a descriptive analysis of 27 studies. Results: 35.7% of the studies occurred in an outpatient care scenario; and 64.2% in hospitals. There was a predominance of swab (100%) in outpatient care and biopsy (55.5%) in the hospital. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were more common at both levels of assistance. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in both. Conclusions: the microbiological profile of infections was similar, with the presence of resistant bacteria in both environments. This fact causes concern and raises the need for research to elucidate it. The studies did not compare the effectiveness between biopsy and swab.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672021000300301Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.74 n.3 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0763info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia,Taysa de FátimaBorges,Eline LimaJunho,Thaisa Oliveira de CastroSpira,Josimare Aparecida Otonieng2021-06-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672021000300301Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2021-06-14T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
title |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
spellingShingle |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study Garcia,Taysa de Fátima Leg Ulcer Culture Techniques Bacterial Growth Infection Nursing |
title_short |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
title_full |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
title_fullStr |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
title_sort |
Microbiological profile of leg ulcer infections: review study |
author |
Garcia,Taysa de Fátima |
author_facet |
Garcia,Taysa de Fátima Borges,Eline Lima Junho,Thaisa Oliveira de Castro Spira,Josimare Aparecida Otoni |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges,Eline Lima Junho,Thaisa Oliveira de Castro Spira,Josimare Aparecida Otoni |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia,Taysa de Fátima Borges,Eline Lima Junho,Thaisa Oliveira de Castro Spira,Josimare Aparecida Otoni |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Leg Ulcer Culture Techniques Bacterial Growth Infection Nursing |
topic |
Leg Ulcer Culture Techniques Bacterial Growth Infection Nursing |
description |
ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the microbiological profile of leg ulcers of patients treated at outpatient clinics and hospitals regarding the type of microorganism, microbiological selection of antibiotics, and techniques for the collection of culture material. Methods: literature review performed on LILACS, IBECS, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases, resulting in a descriptive analysis of 27 studies. Results: 35.7% of the studies occurred in an outpatient care scenario; and 64.2% in hospitals. There was a predominance of swab (100%) in outpatient care and biopsy (55.5%) in the hospital. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were more common at both levels of assistance. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in both. Conclusions: the microbiological profile of infections was similar, with the presence of resistant bacteria in both environments. This fact causes concern and raises the need for research to elucidate it. The studies did not compare the effectiveness between biopsy and swab. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672021000300301 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672021000300301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0763 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.74 n.3 2021 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303039786713088 |