Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis. Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren’t in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue). Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care. |
id |
ABEN-1_452179635a6f43493546427ad5bf698e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672020001600188 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unitChildAdolescentEmergencyRiskClinical ProtocolsABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis. Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren’t in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue). Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.4 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0679info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMagalhães,Fernanda JorgeLima,Francisca Elisângela TeixeiraBarbosa,Lorena PinheiroGuimarães,Fernanda JorgeFelipe,Gilvan FerreiraRolim,Karla Maria CarneiroLima,Essyo Pedro Moreira deeng2020-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020001600188Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-09-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
title |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
spellingShingle |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit Magalhães,Fernanda Jorge Child Adolescent Emergency Risk Clinical Protocols |
title_short |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
title_full |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
title_fullStr |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
title_sort |
Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
author |
Magalhães,Fernanda Jorge |
author_facet |
Magalhães,Fernanda Jorge Lima,Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Barbosa,Lorena Pinheiro Guimarães,Fernanda Jorge Felipe,Gilvan Ferreira Rolim,Karla Maria Carneiro Lima,Essyo Pedro Moreira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima,Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Barbosa,Lorena Pinheiro Guimarães,Fernanda Jorge Felipe,Gilvan Ferreira Rolim,Karla Maria Carneiro Lima,Essyo Pedro Moreira de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Magalhães,Fernanda Jorge Lima,Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Barbosa,Lorena Pinheiro Guimarães,Fernanda Jorge Felipe,Gilvan Ferreira Rolim,Karla Maria Carneiro Lima,Essyo Pedro Moreira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Child Adolescent Emergency Risk Clinical Protocols |
topic |
Child Adolescent Emergency Risk Clinical Protocols |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis. Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren’t in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue). Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0679 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.4 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303038700388352 |