Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scherer,Juliane de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pereira,Jéssica Silveira, Debastiani,Mariana Severo, Bica,Claudia Giuliano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000600157
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the critical alarms predictors of clinical deterioration/sepsis for clinical decision making in patients admitted to a reference hospital complex. Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study. The Machine Learning (ML) tool, Robot Laura®, scores changes in vital parameters and lab tests, classifying them by severity. Inpatients and patients over 18 years of age were included. Results: A total of 122,703 alarms were extracted from the platform, classified as 2 to 9. The pre-selection of critical alarms (6 to 9) indicated 263 urgent alerts (0.2%), from which, after filtering exclusion criteria, 254 alerts were delimited for 61 inpatients. Patient mortality from sepsis was 75%, of which 52% was due to sepsis related to the new coronavirus. After the alarms were answered, 82% of the patients remained in the sectors. Conclusions: Far beyond technology, ML models can speed up assertive clinical decisions by nurses, optimizing time and specialized human resources.
id ABEN-1_5772f6c69d5ce18ce73da6d5bde67443
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672022000600157
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningSepsisClinical Decision SupportInnovationABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the critical alarms predictors of clinical deterioration/sepsis for clinical decision making in patients admitted to a reference hospital complex. Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study. The Machine Learning (ML) tool, Robot Laura®, scores changes in vital parameters and lab tests, classifying them by severity. Inpatients and patients over 18 years of age were included. Results: A total of 122,703 alarms were extracted from the platform, classified as 2 to 9. The pre-selection of critical alarms (6 to 9) indicated 263 urgent alerts (0.2%), from which, after filtering exclusion criteria, 254 alerts were delimited for 61 inpatients. Patient mortality from sepsis was 75%, of which 52% was due to sepsis related to the new coronavirus. After the alarms were answered, 82% of the patients remained in the sectors. Conclusions: Far beyond technology, ML models can speed up assertive clinical decisions by nurses, optimizing time and specialized human resources.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000600157Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.5 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0586info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScherer,Juliane de SouzaPereira,Jéssica SilveiraDebastiani,Mariana SeveroBica,Claudia Giulianoeng2022-05-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672022000600157Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2022-05-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
title Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
spellingShingle Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
Scherer,Juliane de Souza
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Sepsis
Clinical Decision Support
Innovation
title_short Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
title_full Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
title_fullStr Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
title_full_unstemmed Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
title_sort Beyond technology: Can artificial intelligence support clinical decisions in the prediction of sepsis?
author Scherer,Juliane de Souza
author_facet Scherer,Juliane de Souza
Pereira,Jéssica Silveira
Debastiani,Mariana Severo
Bica,Claudia Giuliano
author_role author
author2 Pereira,Jéssica Silveira
Debastiani,Mariana Severo
Bica,Claudia Giuliano
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scherer,Juliane de Souza
Pereira,Jéssica Silveira
Debastiani,Mariana Severo
Bica,Claudia Giuliano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Sepsis
Clinical Decision Support
Innovation
topic Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Sepsis
Clinical Decision Support
Innovation
description ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the critical alarms predictors of clinical deterioration/sepsis for clinical decision making in patients admitted to a reference hospital complex. Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study. The Machine Learning (ML) tool, Robot Laura®, scores changes in vital parameters and lab tests, classifying them by severity. Inpatients and patients over 18 years of age were included. Results: A total of 122,703 alarms were extracted from the platform, classified as 2 to 9. The pre-selection of critical alarms (6 to 9) indicated 263 urgent alerts (0.2%), from which, after filtering exclusion criteria, 254 alerts were delimited for 61 inpatients. Patient mortality from sepsis was 75%, of which 52% was due to sepsis related to the new coronavirus. After the alarms were answered, 82% of the patients remained in the sectors. Conclusions: Far beyond technology, ML models can speed up assertive clinical decisions by nurses, optimizing time and specialized human resources.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000600157
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000600157
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0586
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.5 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303041631158272