Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro,Maria Clara Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Martins,Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva, Schoeller,Soraia Dornelles
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000100156
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the differences of physicians, nurses, and social workers in the evaluation of the health status of the elderly. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study, using descriptive statistics. Non-probabilistic sample, consisting of 291 participants from three professional categories: 71 (24.4%) physicians, 192 (66%) nurses, and 28 (9.6%) social workers. We used a questionnaire including the variables: sociodemographic characteristics and instruments used for evaluation. Results: Instruments with greater utility for the evaluation of the elderly: for physicians, Mini Mental State Examination; for nurses, Braden scale; and for social workers, genogram. In the physical examination, the data most collected by physicians and nurses are the vital signs; and by social workers, the condition for performing the Activities of Daily Living. Conclusions: The evaluation of the elderly is based on a diversity of instruments and is an area in which health and social professionals need to share information.
id ABEN-1_7284f86e39a08a79becbe6dfb0129173
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672022000100156
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerationsHealth PersonnelHealth LevelPatient Care TeamElderlyNursingABSTRACT Objective: To understand the differences of physicians, nurses, and social workers in the evaluation of the health status of the elderly. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study, using descriptive statistics. Non-probabilistic sample, consisting of 291 participants from three professional categories: 71 (24.4%) physicians, 192 (66%) nurses, and 28 (9.6%) social workers. We used a questionnaire including the variables: sociodemographic characteristics and instruments used for evaluation. Results: Instruments with greater utility for the evaluation of the elderly: for physicians, Mini Mental State Examination; for nurses, Braden scale; and for social workers, genogram. In the physical examination, the data most collected by physicians and nurses are the vital signs; and by social workers, the condition for performing the Activities of Daily Living. Conclusions: The evaluation of the elderly is based on a diversity of instruments and is an area in which health and social professionals need to share information.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000100156Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.1 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1277info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro,Maria Clara DuarteMartins,Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da SilvaSchoeller,Soraia Dornelleseng2021-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672022000100156Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2021-09-03T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
title Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
spellingShingle Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
Monteiro,Maria Clara Duarte
Health Personnel
Health Level
Patient Care Team
Elderly
Nursing
title_short Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
title_full Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
title_fullStr Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
title_sort Evaluation of the health level of the elderly: patient care team considerations
author Monteiro,Maria Clara Duarte
author_facet Monteiro,Maria Clara Duarte
Martins,Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva
Schoeller,Soraia Dornelles
author_role author
author2 Martins,Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva
Schoeller,Soraia Dornelles
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro,Maria Clara Duarte
Martins,Maria Manuela Ferreira Pereira da Silva
Schoeller,Soraia Dornelles
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Personnel
Health Level
Patient Care Team
Elderly
Nursing
topic Health Personnel
Health Level
Patient Care Team
Elderly
Nursing
description ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the differences of physicians, nurses, and social workers in the evaluation of the health status of the elderly. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study, using descriptive statistics. Non-probabilistic sample, consisting of 291 participants from three professional categories: 71 (24.4%) physicians, 192 (66%) nurses, and 28 (9.6%) social workers. We used a questionnaire including the variables: sociodemographic characteristics and instruments used for evaluation. Results: Instruments with greater utility for the evaluation of the elderly: for physicians, Mini Mental State Examination; for nurses, Braden scale; and for social workers, genogram. In the physical examination, the data most collected by physicians and nurses are the vital signs; and by social workers, the condition for performing the Activities of Daily Living. Conclusions: The evaluation of the elderly is based on a diversity of instruments and is an area in which health and social professionals need to share information.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000100156
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000100156
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1277
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.1 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303040832143360

Registros relacionados