Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arik,Roberta Marielle
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Parada,Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima, Tonete,Vera Lúcia Pamplona, Sleutjes,Fernanda Cristina Manzini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000900041
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth. Method: this is a qualitative research, based on the assumptions of the Humanization of Obstetric Care. 15 pregnant women were interviewed twice at the beginning and the end of gestation between October 2015 and May 2016. Data were analyzed according to the method of the Discourse of the Collective Subject. Results: the discourses were associated with four themes: Advantages of vaginal birth over cesarean section; Fear and unpredictability of vaginal birth; Importance of the doctor in the definition of the type of birth; and Influence of family and friends in choosing the type of birth. Final considerations: according to pregnant women, vaginal birth has more benefit compared to cesarean section. However, during gestation and birth, fear of pain and the unexpected, and medical opinions of friends and family against vaginal birth strongly influence the choice of cesarean section.
id ABEN-1_799658a3d2fd0dd1fa233c25ac031719
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672019000900041
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birthPregnant WomenParturitionHumanization of AssistanceNursingQualitative ResearchABSTRACT Objective: to understand the perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth. Method: this is a qualitative research, based on the assumptions of the Humanization of Obstetric Care. 15 pregnant women were interviewed twice at the beginning and the end of gestation between October 2015 and May 2016. Data were analyzed according to the method of the Discourse of the Collective Subject. Results: the discourses were associated with four themes: Advantages of vaginal birth over cesarean section; Fear and unpredictability of vaginal birth; Importance of the doctor in the definition of the type of birth; and Influence of family and friends in choosing the type of birth. Final considerations: according to pregnant women, vaginal birth has more benefit compared to cesarean section. However, during gestation and birth, fear of pain and the unexpected, and medical opinions of friends and family against vaginal birth strongly influence the choice of cesarean section.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000900041Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 suppl.3 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0731info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArik,Roberta MarielleParada,Cristina Maria Garcia de LimaTonete,Vera Lúcia PamplonaSleutjes,Fernanda Cristina Manzinieng2019-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672019000900041Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2019-12-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
title Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
spellingShingle Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
Arik,Roberta Marielle
Pregnant Women
Parturition
Humanization of Assistance
Nursing
Qualitative Research
title_short Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
title_full Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
title_fullStr Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
title_sort Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth
author Arik,Roberta Marielle
author_facet Arik,Roberta Marielle
Parada,Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima
Tonete,Vera Lúcia Pamplona
Sleutjes,Fernanda Cristina Manzini
author_role author
author2 Parada,Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima
Tonete,Vera Lúcia Pamplona
Sleutjes,Fernanda Cristina Manzini
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arik,Roberta Marielle
Parada,Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima
Tonete,Vera Lúcia Pamplona
Sleutjes,Fernanda Cristina Manzini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pregnant Women
Parturition
Humanization of Assistance
Nursing
Qualitative Research
topic Pregnant Women
Parturition
Humanization of Assistance
Nursing
Qualitative Research
description ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth. Method: this is a qualitative research, based on the assumptions of the Humanization of Obstetric Care. 15 pregnant women were interviewed twice at the beginning and the end of gestation between October 2015 and May 2016. Data were analyzed according to the method of the Discourse of the Collective Subject. Results: the discourses were associated with four themes: Advantages of vaginal birth over cesarean section; Fear and unpredictability of vaginal birth; Importance of the doctor in the definition of the type of birth; and Influence of family and friends in choosing the type of birth. Final considerations: according to pregnant women, vaginal birth has more benefit compared to cesarean section. However, during gestation and birth, fear of pain and the unexpected, and medical opinions of friends and family against vaginal birth strongly influence the choice of cesarean section.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000900041
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000900041
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0731
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 suppl.3 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303036742696960

Registros relacionados