Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000400164 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the ergonomics of two models of breastfeeding bras. Methods: descriptive study carried out with 152 infants in a Brazilian university hospital. The prototypes were separated into two groups (A and B). To compare the two bra models, the Odds Ratio (OR) was used as a measure of the strength of the association. In subjective perceptions, the Modified Borg Scale, and the chi-square test of independence (χ2) were used. To compare the two prototypes, the Z test and logistic regression analysis were performed. A significance level of 5% was considered. Results: the bra in group B was more suitable for ergonomics of physical and psycho-aesthetic comfort than the bra in group A (p < 0.0001), according to the logistic regression tests. Conclusions: modeling B was ergonomically adequate, with usability and evaluation criteria centered on breastfeeding women. |
id |
ABEN-1_7f23f4556cd9d327061f5a88ec7f2941 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672022000400164 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursingNursingBreast FeedingErgonomicsModels AnatomicPostpartum PeriodABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the ergonomics of two models of breastfeeding bras. Methods: descriptive study carried out with 152 infants in a Brazilian university hospital. The prototypes were separated into two groups (A and B). To compare the two bra models, the Odds Ratio (OR) was used as a measure of the strength of the association. In subjective perceptions, the Modified Borg Scale, and the chi-square test of independence (χ2) were used. To compare the two prototypes, the Z test and logistic regression analysis were performed. A significance level of 5% was considered. Results: the bra in group B was more suitable for ergonomics of physical and psycho-aesthetic comfort than the bra in group A (p < 0.0001), according to the logistic regression tests. Conclusions: modeling B was ergonomically adequate, with usability and evaluation criteria centered on breastfeeding women.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000400164Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.3 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0264info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHeberle,Anita Batista dos SantosCardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida MacielHigarashi,Ieda HarumiCarvalho,Maria Dalva de BarrosNohama,PercyPelloso,Sandra Marisaeng2021-11-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672022000400164Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2021-11-26T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
title |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
spellingShingle |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing Heberle,Anita Batista dos Santos Nursing Breast Feeding Ergonomics Models Anatomic Postpartum Period |
title_short |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
title_full |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
title_fullStr |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
title_sort |
Ergonomics of anatomical bra models for breastfeeding: a contribution of nursing |
author |
Heberle,Anita Batista dos Santos |
author_facet |
Heberle,Anita Batista dos Santos Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Nohama,Percy Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Nohama,Percy Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Heberle,Anita Batista dos Santos Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Nohama,Percy Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing Breast Feeding Ergonomics Models Anatomic Postpartum Period |
topic |
Nursing Breast Feeding Ergonomics Models Anatomic Postpartum Period |
description |
ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the ergonomics of two models of breastfeeding bras. Methods: descriptive study carried out with 152 infants in a Brazilian university hospital. The prototypes were separated into two groups (A and B). To compare the two bra models, the Odds Ratio (OR) was used as a measure of the strength of the association. In subjective perceptions, the Modified Borg Scale, and the chi-square test of independence (χ2) were used. To compare the two prototypes, the Z test and logistic regression analysis were performed. A significance level of 5% was considered. Results: the bra in group B was more suitable for ergonomics of physical and psycho-aesthetic comfort than the bra in group A (p < 0.0001), according to the logistic regression tests. Conclusions: modeling B was ergonomically adequate, with usability and evaluation criteria centered on breastfeeding women. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000400164 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672022000400164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0264 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.75 n.3 2022 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303041252622336 |