Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600157 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze near miss cases among newborns hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study using the STROBE guideline. Data were collected from 1,101 records of live births (newborns). Statistical analysis used the Epi-Info program 3.3.2 and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 162 newborns were hospitalized, of which 63 had at least one criterion of near miss. The variables that remained associated with neonatal near miss were weight <1.750 g, gestational age <33 weeks and Apgar at 5 minutes <7, pragmatic criteria to identify cases of neonatal near miss morbidity. Conclusion: Prematurity and low birth weight were the factors that contributed most to the near miss outcome among newborns hospitalized in intensive care, a rate two and a half times higher than the number of deaths, according to scientific evidence. |
id |
ABEN-1_8ef3c88f5d43cd6493837466198cbcf9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672020000600157 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unitMorbidityNeonatal mortalityNear missNursingNeonatal Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT Objective: To analyze near miss cases among newborns hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study using the STROBE guideline. Data were collected from 1,101 records of live births (newborns). Statistical analysis used the Epi-Info program 3.3.2 and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 162 newborns were hospitalized, of which 63 had at least one criterion of near miss. The variables that remained associated with neonatal near miss were weight <1.750 g, gestational age <33 weeks and Apgar at 5 minutes <7, pragmatic criteria to identify cases of neonatal near miss morbidity. Conclusion: Prematurity and low birth weight were the factors that contributed most to the near miss outcome among newborns hospitalized in intensive care, a rate two and a half times higher than the number of deaths, according to scientific evidence.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600157Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0931info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia,Maria Rita GuimarãesFerrari,Rosângela Aparecida PimentaCardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida MacielHigarashi,Ieda HarumiCarvalho,Maria Dalva de BarrosPelloso,Sandra Marisaeng2020-08-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020000600157Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-08-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
title |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
spellingShingle |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit Maia,Maria Rita Guimarães Morbidity Neonatal mortality Near miss Nursing Neonatal Intensive Care Units |
title_short |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
title_full |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
title_fullStr |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
title_sort |
Neonatal near miss in the intensive care unit |
author |
Maia,Maria Rita Guimarães |
author_facet |
Maia,Maria Rita Guimarães Ferrari,Rosângela Aparecida Pimenta Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferrari,Rosângela Aparecida Pimenta Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maia,Maria Rita Guimarães Ferrari,Rosângela Aparecida Pimenta Cardelli,Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel Higarashi,Ieda Harumi Carvalho,Maria Dalva de Barros Pelloso,Sandra Marisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Morbidity Neonatal mortality Near miss Nursing Neonatal Intensive Care Units |
topic |
Morbidity Neonatal mortality Near miss Nursing Neonatal Intensive Care Units |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze near miss cases among newborns hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study using the STROBE guideline. Data were collected from 1,101 records of live births (newborns). Statistical analysis used the Epi-Info program 3.3.2 and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 162 newborns were hospitalized, of which 63 had at least one criterion of near miss. The variables that remained associated with neonatal near miss were weight <1.750 g, gestational age <33 weeks and Apgar at 5 minutes <7, pragmatic criteria to identify cases of neonatal near miss morbidity. Conclusion: Prematurity and low birth weight were the factors that contributed most to the near miss outcome among newborns hospitalized in intensive care, a rate two and a half times higher than the number of deaths, according to scientific evidence. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600157 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600157 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0931 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.6 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303037903470592 |