Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araújo,Mércio Gabriel de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Vitor,Allyne Fortes, Silva,Amanda Barbosa da, Carvalho,Leandro Melo de, Alves,Dase Luyza Barbosa de Sousa, Araújo,Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001700168
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To validate the content of the indicators of the nursing outcome Dry eye severity, of the Nursing Outcomes Classification, in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Methodological study of content validity, developed in two stages: the first, consisting of 23 specialists; and the second, of a consensus group formed by ten nurses. For analyzing the data in the first stage, we used the content validity index and binomial test for each indicator; in the second stage, the discussions of each meeting were transcripted, and the indicators that achieved 100% consensus were validated. Results: Of the 14 indicators evaluated by the specialists, 7 presented a cut-off point below 0.80, but did not show statistical significance in the binomial test. In the consensus group’s validation, six indicators were reformulated. Conclusion: This study considered the 14 indicators valid for evaluating patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
id ABEN-1_931391f0d3ee5917022316074e313bcf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672020001700168
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severityValidation StudiesDry Eye SyndromesNursing EvaluationNursingIntensive Care UnitABSTRACT Objective: To validate the content of the indicators of the nursing outcome Dry eye severity, of the Nursing Outcomes Classification, in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Methodological study of content validity, developed in two stages: the first, consisting of 23 specialists; and the second, of a consensus group formed by ten nurses. For analyzing the data in the first stage, we used the content validity index and binomial test for each indicator; in the second stage, the discussions of each meeting were transcripted, and the indicators that achieved 100% consensus were validated. Results: Of the 14 indicators evaluated by the specialists, 7 presented a cut-off point below 0.80, but did not show statistical significance in the binomial test. In the consensus group’s validation, six indicators were reformulated. Conclusion: This study considered the 14 indicators valid for evaluating patients admitted to the intensive care unit.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001700168Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.5 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0854info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo,Mércio Gabriel deVitor,Allyne FortesSilva,Amanda Barbosa daCarvalho,Leandro Melo deAlves,Dase Luyza Barbosa de SousaAraújo,Jéssica Naiara de Medeiroseng2020-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020001700168Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-12-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
title Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
spellingShingle Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
Araújo,Mércio Gabriel de
Validation Studies
Dry Eye Syndromes
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing
Intensive Care Unit
title_short Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
title_full Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
title_fullStr Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
title_full_unstemmed Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
title_sort Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity
author Araújo,Mércio Gabriel de
author_facet Araújo,Mércio Gabriel de
Vitor,Allyne Fortes
Silva,Amanda Barbosa da
Carvalho,Leandro Melo de
Alves,Dase Luyza Barbosa de Sousa
Araújo,Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros
author_role author
author2 Vitor,Allyne Fortes
Silva,Amanda Barbosa da
Carvalho,Leandro Melo de
Alves,Dase Luyza Barbosa de Sousa
Araújo,Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo,Mércio Gabriel de
Vitor,Allyne Fortes
Silva,Amanda Barbosa da
Carvalho,Leandro Melo de
Alves,Dase Luyza Barbosa de Sousa
Araújo,Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Validation Studies
Dry Eye Syndromes
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing
Intensive Care Unit
topic Validation Studies
Dry Eye Syndromes
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing
Intensive Care Unit
description ABSTRACT Objective: To validate the content of the indicators of the nursing outcome Dry eye severity, of the Nursing Outcomes Classification, in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: Methodological study of content validity, developed in two stages: the first, consisting of 23 specialists; and the second, of a consensus group formed by ten nurses. For analyzing the data in the first stage, we used the content validity index and binomial test for each indicator; in the second stage, the discussions of each meeting were transcripted, and the indicators that achieved 100% consensus were validated. Results: Of the 14 indicators evaluated by the specialists, 7 presented a cut-off point below 0.80, but did not show statistical significance in the binomial test. In the consensus group’s validation, six indicators were reformulated. Conclusion: This study considered the 14 indicators valid for evaluating patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001700168
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001700168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0854
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.5 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303038987698176

Registros relacionados