Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603035 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To measure the response time of health professionals before sound alarm activation and the implications for patient safety. Method: This is a quantitative and observational research conducted in an Adult Intensive Care Unit of a teaching hospital. Three researchers conducted non-participant observations for seven hours. Data collection occurred simultaneously in 20 beds during the morning shift. When listening the alarm activation, the researchers turned on the stopwatches and recorded the motive, the response time and the professional conduct. During collection, the unit had 90% of beds occupied and teams were complete. Result: We verified that from the 103 equipment activated, 66.03% of alarms fatigued. Nursing was the professional category that most provided care (31.06%) and the multi-parameter monitor was the device that alarmed the most (66.09%). Conclusion: Results corroborate the absence or delay of the response of teams, suggesting that relevant alarms might have been underestimated, compromising patient safety. |
id |
ABEN-1_a1c5986c6207c97f92ed5b627dcc6b54 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672018000603035 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safetyNursingCritical CareClinical AlarmsBiomedical TechnologyPatient SafetyABSTRACT Objective: To measure the response time of health professionals before sound alarm activation and the implications for patient safety. Method: This is a quantitative and observational research conducted in an Adult Intensive Care Unit of a teaching hospital. Three researchers conducted non-participant observations for seven hours. Data collection occurred simultaneously in 20 beds during the morning shift. When listening the alarm activation, the researchers turned on the stopwatches and recorded the motive, the response time and the professional conduct. During collection, the unit had 90% of beds occupied and teams were complete. Result: We verified that from the 103 equipment activated, 66.03% of alarms fatigued. Nursing was the professional category that most provided care (31.06%) and the multi-parameter monitor was the device that alarmed the most (66.09%). Conclusion: Results corroborate the absence or delay of the response of teams, suggesting that relevant alarms might have been underestimated, compromising patient safety.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603035Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0481info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Adriana Elisa Carcereri deMachado,Adrielle BarbosaSantos,Edson Duque dosAlmeida,Érika Bicalho deeng2018-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672018000603035Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2018-12-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
title |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
spellingShingle |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety Oliveira,Adriana Elisa Carcereri de Nursing Critical Care Clinical Alarms Biomedical Technology Patient Safety |
title_short |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
title_full |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
title_fullStr |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
title_sort |
Alarm fatigue and the implications for patient safety |
author |
Oliveira,Adriana Elisa Carcereri de |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Adriana Elisa Carcereri de Machado,Adrielle Barbosa Santos,Edson Duque dos Almeida,Érika Bicalho de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado,Adrielle Barbosa Santos,Edson Duque dos Almeida,Érika Bicalho de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Adriana Elisa Carcereri de Machado,Adrielle Barbosa Santos,Edson Duque dos Almeida,Érika Bicalho de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing Critical Care Clinical Alarms Biomedical Technology Patient Safety |
topic |
Nursing Critical Care Clinical Alarms Biomedical Technology Patient Safety |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To measure the response time of health professionals before sound alarm activation and the implications for patient safety. Method: This is a quantitative and observational research conducted in an Adult Intensive Care Unit of a teaching hospital. Three researchers conducted non-participant observations for seven hours. Data collection occurred simultaneously in 20 beds during the morning shift. When listening the alarm activation, the researchers turned on the stopwatches and recorded the motive, the response time and the professional conduct. During collection, the unit had 90% of beds occupied and teams were complete. Result: We verified that from the 103 equipment activated, 66.03% of alarms fatigued. Nursing was the professional category that most provided care (31.06%) and the multi-parameter monitor was the device that alarmed the most (66.09%). Conclusion: Results corroborate the absence or delay of the response of teams, suggesting that relevant alarms might have been underestimated, compromising patient safety. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603035 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0481 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.6 2018 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303034807025664 |