Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Frota,Oleci Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Adriano Menis, Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro, Andrade,Denise de, Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral, Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods.
id ABEN-1_b9c26a967d16928734d9617e99b9fb0d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672020000100401
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methodsCross InfectionEquipment ContaminationHousekeeping, HospitalDisinfectionProcess Assessment (Health Care)ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.1 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0623info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrota,Oleci PereiraFerreira,Adriano MenisRigotti,Marcelo AlessandroAndrade,Denise deBorges,Nájla Moreira AmaralFerreira Júnior,Marcos Antonioeng2020-02-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020000100401Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-02-04T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
title Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
spellingShingle Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
Frota,Oleci Pereira
Cross Infection
Equipment Contamination
Housekeeping, Hospital
Disinfection
Process Assessment (Health Care)
title_short Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
title_full Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
title_fullStr Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
title_sort Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
author Frota,Oleci Pereira
author_facet Frota,Oleci Pereira
Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
Andrade,Denise de
Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral
Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
Andrade,Denise de
Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral
Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Frota,Oleci Pereira
Ferreira,Adriano Menis
Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro
Andrade,Denise de
Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral
Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cross Infection
Equipment Contamination
Housekeeping, Hospital
Disinfection
Process Assessment (Health Care)
topic Cross Infection
Equipment Contamination
Housekeeping, Hospital
Disinfection
Process Assessment (Health Care)
description ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0623
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.1 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303037117038592