Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods. |
id |
ABEN-1_b9c26a967d16928734d9617e99b9fb0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672020000100401 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methodsCross InfectionEquipment ContaminationHousekeeping, HospitalDisinfectionProcess Assessment (Health Care)ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.1 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0623info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrota,Oleci PereiraFerreira,Adriano MenisRigotti,Marcelo AlessandroAndrade,Denise deBorges,Nájla Moreira AmaralFerreira Júnior,Marcos Antonioeng2020-02-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020000100401Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-02-04T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
title |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
spellingShingle |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods Frota,Oleci Pereira Cross Infection Equipment Contamination Housekeeping, Hospital Disinfection Process Assessment (Health Care) |
title_short |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
title_full |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
title_sort |
Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods |
author |
Frota,Oleci Pereira |
author_facet |
Frota,Oleci Pereira Ferreira,Adriano Menis Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro Andrade,Denise de Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Adriano Menis Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro Andrade,Denise de Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Frota,Oleci Pereira Ferreira,Adriano Menis Rigotti,Marcelo Alessandro Andrade,Denise de Borges,Nájla Moreira Amaral Ferreira Júnior,Marcos Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cross Infection Equipment Contamination Housekeeping, Hospital Disinfection Process Assessment (Health Care) |
topic |
Cross Infection Equipment Contamination Housekeeping, Hospital Disinfection Process Assessment (Health Care) |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultures, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. The first two are used to evaluate the process and to predict adherence to protocols by the staff, and the last two are employed to evaluate the results, therefore being the most relevant to assess the risk of infection. Final considerations: The ideal method was not found, because all of them showed limitations. There is a need for strategies to optimize the precision of these methods. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000100401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0623 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.1 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303037117038592 |