Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603121 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To present the validation of a theoretical model through conversation circles in a qualitative research guided by the Grounded Theory. Method: Study carried out from a thesis developed in a reference hospital in the south region of Brazil. Two conversation circles happened, with participation of representatives of the “Training Prism”, in the months of October and November, 2016. Results: The conversation circle enabled an in depth dialogic approach of the subject of research, broadening the vision on the phenomenon and on the research. The circle also mobilized thinking as it highlighted the subjectivity of individuals, expanding the group’s ability of understanding and assisting in the validation process of a theoretical model. Conclusion: The conversation circle emerges as a powerful strategy for the development of qualitative research in nursing, more specifically in the validation step of the Grounded Theory. |
id |
ABEN-1_e030a2541c691fff3bf3f0e49f5b48c5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672018000603121 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategyNursingQualitative ResearchMethodologyNursing ResearchGrounded TheoryABSTRACT Objective: To present the validation of a theoretical model through conversation circles in a qualitative research guided by the Grounded Theory. Method: Study carried out from a thesis developed in a reference hospital in the south region of Brazil. Two conversation circles happened, with participation of representatives of the “Training Prism”, in the months of October and November, 2016. Results: The conversation circle enabled an in depth dialogic approach of the subject of research, broadening the vision on the phenomenon and on the research. The circle also mobilized thinking as it highlighted the subjectivity of individuals, expanding the group’s ability of understanding and assisting in the validation process of a theoretical model. Conclusion: The conversation circle emerges as a powerful strategy for the development of qualitative research in nursing, more specifically in the validation step of the Grounded Theory.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603121Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0488info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAdamy,Edlamar KátiaZocche,Denise Antunes de AzambujaVendruscolo,CarineSantos,José Luis Guedes dosAlmeida,Miriam de Abreueng2018-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672018000603121Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2018-12-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
title |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
spellingShingle |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy Adamy,Edlamar Kátia Nursing Qualitative Research Methodology Nursing Research Grounded Theory |
title_short |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
title_full |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
title_fullStr |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
title_sort |
Validation in grounded theory: conversation circles as a methodological strategy |
author |
Adamy,Edlamar Kátia |
author_facet |
Adamy,Edlamar Kátia Zocche,Denise Antunes de Azambuja Vendruscolo,Carine Santos,José Luis Guedes dos Almeida,Miriam de Abreu |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zocche,Denise Antunes de Azambuja Vendruscolo,Carine Santos,José Luis Guedes dos Almeida,Miriam de Abreu |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Adamy,Edlamar Kátia Zocche,Denise Antunes de Azambuja Vendruscolo,Carine Santos,José Luis Guedes dos Almeida,Miriam de Abreu |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing Qualitative Research Methodology Nursing Research Grounded Theory |
topic |
Nursing Qualitative Research Methodology Nursing Research Grounded Theory |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To present the validation of a theoretical model through conversation circles in a qualitative research guided by the Grounded Theory. Method: Study carried out from a thesis developed in a reference hospital in the south region of Brazil. Two conversation circles happened, with participation of representatives of the “Training Prism”, in the months of October and November, 2016. Results: The conversation circle enabled an in depth dialogic approach of the subject of research, broadening the vision on the phenomenon and on the research. The circle also mobilized thinking as it highlighted the subjectivity of individuals, expanding the group’s ability of understanding and assisting in the validation process of a theoretical model. Conclusion: The conversation circle emerges as a powerful strategy for the development of qualitative research in nursing, more specifically in the validation step of the Grounded Theory. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603121 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672018000603121 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0488 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.71 n.6 2018 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303034823802880 |