Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600179 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the stages of construction and content validation of an instrument to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops. Methods: this methodological study focused on validating the instrument’s content. The instrument developed was assessed by a committee of experts using the Delphi Technique, in two rounds. For the degree of agreement, percentage agreement and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used. Results: in the first round, six experts participated, and the degree of agreement was 87% for clarity and 94% for representativeness. In the second round, five experts participated, the CVI was 0.95 for clarity, 0.97 for representativeness and 0.96 total CVI. The final instrument had 42 items divided into three chunks. Conclusion: the instrument has content validity to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops, being a tool for the use of state and municipal administrations. |
id |
ABEN-1_e2a4689ad0b487fb5fd115949c1487d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672020000600179 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrumentPrimary Health CareHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsValidation StudiesProgram EvaluationHealth Planning SupportABSTRACT Objective: to describe the stages of construction and content validation of an instrument to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops. Methods: this methodological study focused on validating the instrument’s content. The instrument developed was assessed by a committee of experts using the Delphi Technique, in two rounds. For the degree of agreement, percentage agreement and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used. Results: in the first round, six experts participated, and the degree of agreement was 87% for clarity and 94% for representativeness. In the second round, five experts participated, the CVI was 0.95 for clarity, 0.97 for representativeness and 0.96 total CVI. The final instrument had 42 items divided into three chunks. Conclusion: the instrument has content validity to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops, being a tool for the use of state and municipal administrations.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600179Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0545info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNicola,TaináWeis,Alísia Helenaeng2020-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020000600179Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-09-03T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
title |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
spellingShingle |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument Nicola,Tainá Primary Health Care Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms Validation Studies Program Evaluation Health Planning Support |
title_short |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
title_full |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
title_fullStr |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
title_sort |
Primary Health Care Planning workshops: construction and validation of an assessment instrument |
author |
Nicola,Tainá |
author_facet |
Nicola,Tainá Weis,Alísia Helena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Weis,Alísia Helena |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nicola,Tainá Weis,Alísia Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Primary Health Care Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms Validation Studies Program Evaluation Health Planning Support |
topic |
Primary Health Care Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms Validation Studies Program Evaluation Health Planning Support |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the stages of construction and content validation of an instrument to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops. Methods: this methodological study focused on validating the instrument’s content. The instrument developed was assessed by a committee of experts using the Delphi Technique, in two rounds. For the degree of agreement, percentage agreement and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used. Results: in the first round, six experts participated, and the degree of agreement was 87% for clarity and 94% for representativeness. In the second round, five experts participated, the CVI was 0.95 for clarity, 0.97 for representativeness and 0.96 total CVI. The final instrument had 42 items divided into three chunks. Conclusion: the instrument has content validity to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops, being a tool for the use of state and municipal administrations. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600179 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000600179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0545 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.6 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303038163517440 |