A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Production |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100207 |
Resumo: | Abstract Paper Aims This paper aims to develop an approach to support group decision making combining methods and tools to a holistic MCDA process. Originality Authors have been using Value-Focused Thinking (VFT) for structuring problems with different MCDA methods, but there is a lack of a process that defines a clear transition from VFT to those methods. Here we propose a process to fill this gap. Research method Rich Picture and VFT structure the problem and elicit objectives that become criteria within a decision hierarchy. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with ratings supports preference elicitation and sensitivity analysis in the judgment weights of decision-makers. Main findings VFT is effective for eliciting the decision structure to AHP; using weight distribution of stakeholders may affect the results, and the multimethodology approach developed here can deal with group decision making. Implications for theory and practice The approach developed is effective in complex environments (complex problems and multiple stakeholders) because it focuses on values and defines a process to bring those values into a multicriteria method. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis with the judgment weights of the different stakeholders may be useful in negotiation. |
id |
ABEPRO-1_16a984caa3ed41eb30ec72758b546be1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100207 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operationsMCDA processMultimethodologyRanking problematicGroup preference aggregationAbstract Paper Aims This paper aims to develop an approach to support group decision making combining methods and tools to a holistic MCDA process. Originality Authors have been using Value-Focused Thinking (VFT) for structuring problems with different MCDA methods, but there is a lack of a process that defines a clear transition from VFT to those methods. Here we propose a process to fill this gap. Research method Rich Picture and VFT structure the problem and elicit objectives that become criteria within a decision hierarchy. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with ratings supports preference elicitation and sensitivity analysis in the judgment weights of decision-makers. Main findings VFT is effective for eliciting the decision structure to AHP; using weight distribution of stakeholders may affect the results, and the multimethodology approach developed here can deal with group decision making. Implications for theory and practice The approach developed is effective in complex environments (complex problems and multiple stakeholders) because it focuses on values and defines a process to bring those values into a multicriteria method. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis with the judgment weights of the different stakeholders may be useful in negotiation.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100207Production v.32 2022reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210059info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLogullo,YgorBigogno-Costa,ViníciusSilva,Amanda Cecília Simões daBelderrain,Mischel Carmeneng2022-02-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100207Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2022-02-15T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
title |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
spellingShingle |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations Logullo,Ygor MCDA process Multimethodology Ranking problematic Group preference aggregation |
title_short |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
title_full |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
title_fullStr |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
title_full_unstemmed |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
title_sort |
A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations |
author |
Logullo,Ygor |
author_facet |
Logullo,Ygor Bigogno-Costa,Vinícius Silva,Amanda Cecília Simões da Belderrain,Mischel Carmen |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bigogno-Costa,Vinícius Silva,Amanda Cecília Simões da Belderrain,Mischel Carmen |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Logullo,Ygor Bigogno-Costa,Vinícius Silva,Amanda Cecília Simões da Belderrain,Mischel Carmen |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
MCDA process Multimethodology Ranking problematic Group preference aggregation |
topic |
MCDA process Multimethodology Ranking problematic Group preference aggregation |
description |
Abstract Paper Aims This paper aims to develop an approach to support group decision making combining methods and tools to a holistic MCDA process. Originality Authors have been using Value-Focused Thinking (VFT) for structuring problems with different MCDA methods, but there is a lack of a process that defines a clear transition from VFT to those methods. Here we propose a process to fill this gap. Research method Rich Picture and VFT structure the problem and elicit objectives that become criteria within a decision hierarchy. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with ratings supports preference elicitation and sensitivity analysis in the judgment weights of decision-makers. Main findings VFT is effective for eliciting the decision structure to AHP; using weight distribution of stakeholders may affect the results, and the multimethodology approach developed here can deal with group decision making. Implications for theory and practice The approach developed is effective in complex environments (complex problems and multiple stakeholders) because it focuses on values and defines a process to bring those values into a multicriteria method. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis with the judgment weights of the different stakeholders may be useful in negotiation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100207 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100207 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6513.20210059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Production v.32 2022 reponame:Production instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Production |
collection |
Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||production@editoracubo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754213154850603008 |