Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Production |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402 |
Resumo: | Abstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM. |
id |
ABEPRO-1_1c87648b6f778939b9cd040a29dd4ff1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100402 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 casesInjuryFall accidentsRisk controlWorkplace fatalitiesSafety in constructionAbstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402Production v.29 2019reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20180091info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZlatar,TomiLago,Eliane Maria GorgaSoares,Willames de AlbuquerqueBaptista,João dos SantosBarkokébas Junior,Bédaeng2019-05-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2019-05-09T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
title |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
spellingShingle |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases Zlatar,Tomi Injury Fall accidents Risk control Workplace fatalities Safety in construction |
title_short |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
title_full |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
title_fullStr |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
title_full_unstemmed |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
title_sort |
Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases |
author |
Zlatar,Tomi |
author_facet |
Zlatar,Tomi Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga Soares,Willames de Albuquerque Baptista,João dos Santos Barkokébas Junior,Béda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga Soares,Willames de Albuquerque Baptista,João dos Santos Barkokébas Junior,Béda |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zlatar,Tomi Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga Soares,Willames de Albuquerque Baptista,João dos Santos Barkokébas Junior,Béda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Injury Fall accidents Risk control Workplace fatalities Safety in construction |
topic |
Injury Fall accidents Risk control Workplace fatalities Safety in construction |
description |
Abstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6513.20180091 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Production v.29 2019 reponame:Production instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Production |
collection |
Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||production@editoracubo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754213154496184320 |