Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zlatar,Tomi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga, Soares,Willames de Albuquerque, Baptista,João dos Santos, Barkokébas Junior,Béda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402
Resumo: Abstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM.
id ABEPRO-1_1c87648b6f778939b9cd040a29dd4ff1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100402
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling Falls from height: analysis of 114 casesInjuryFall accidentsRisk controlWorkplace fatalitiesSafety in constructionAbstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402Production v.29 2019reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20180091info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZlatar,TomiLago,Eliane Maria GorgaSoares,Willames de AlbuquerqueBaptista,João dos SantosBarkokébas Junior,Bédaeng2019-05-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132019000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2019-05-09T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
title Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
spellingShingle Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
Zlatar,Tomi
Injury
Fall accidents
Risk control
Workplace fatalities
Safety in construction
title_short Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
title_full Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
title_fullStr Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
title_full_unstemmed Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
title_sort Falls from height: analysis of 114 cases
author Zlatar,Tomi
author_facet Zlatar,Tomi
Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga
Soares,Willames de Albuquerque
Baptista,João dos Santos
Barkokébas Junior,Béda
author_role author
author2 Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga
Soares,Willames de Albuquerque
Baptista,João dos Santos
Barkokébas Junior,Béda
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zlatar,Tomi
Lago,Eliane Maria Gorga
Soares,Willames de Albuquerque
Baptista,João dos Santos
Barkokébas Junior,Béda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Injury
Fall accidents
Risk control
Workplace fatalities
Safety in construction
topic Injury
Fall accidents
Risk control
Workplace fatalities
Safety in construction
description Abstract Paper aims To study fall-accident cases in order to analyze the commonly missing or not adequately applied risk management measures (RMM) and its consequences depending on falling height. Originality First study to analyze failed RMM for preventing falls from height. Research method The study reviewed court cases published by the journal “Safety & Health Practitioner”. NIOSH recommendations were used to define RMM to apply to this study. Main findings Finally, in 98% of analyzed cases, the fall from height was a result of several non-adequate or missing RMM: in 81.6% procedures of work, 65.8% guardrails and edge protection, 60.5% risk assessment, and 60.5% platforms or scaffolds. It can be concluded that falls from height pose a significant risk for workers, which could be prevented by adequately apply RMM. Implications for theory and practice The focus in the prevention of falls should be given on most common RMM.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132019000100402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.20180091
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.29 2019
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154496184320