A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal,Gustavo dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Romão,Estevão Luiz, Reis,Daniel Leal de Paula Esteves dos, Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo, Paiva,Anderson Paulo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100225
Resumo: Abstract Paper aims Frequently, researchers try to find a better way to allocate assets in order to have maximum return and low variability in a portfolio as diverse as possible. This paper aims to apply D-Optimal Design in the context of Mixture Design and portfolio optimization to efficiently select the runs of the proposed experimental design. Originality A new approach to find the optimal weights that maximize the returns and minimize the risk using D-Optimal Design was used. A multi-response optimization problem considering returns, variability and entropy as functions of the weights was proposed. However, as there is a significant correlation between the objective functions, a Factor Analysis combined with FMSE to dimensionality reduction was used. Research method All the steps for both stages of the methodology applied in this paper are presented below: select real time series; predict one step ahead; generate a D-Optimal mixture design; apply weights and generate mathematical models; solve the optimization problem. Main findings Using the desirability method, the optimal values were determined, obtaining approximately 79% for the compound desirability function. The proposed method presented a 16.80% higher return with a 4.98% higher risk exposure if compared against Naïve method. Implications for theory and practice The proposed methodology can be applied to any portfolio optimization study. Mixture Design studies have already been proposed for modeling portfolio optimization problems. However, the D-Optimal Design proved to be adequate, which represents less computational effort.
id ABEPRO-1_74c848c47654b2db9cb0e4866fbfdb96
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100225
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experimentsPortfolio optimizationD-Optimal designMixture designMultivariate analysisAbstract Paper aims Frequently, researchers try to find a better way to allocate assets in order to have maximum return and low variability in a portfolio as diverse as possible. This paper aims to apply D-Optimal Design in the context of Mixture Design and portfolio optimization to efficiently select the runs of the proposed experimental design. Originality A new approach to find the optimal weights that maximize the returns and minimize the risk using D-Optimal Design was used. A multi-response optimization problem considering returns, variability and entropy as functions of the weights was proposed. However, as there is a significant correlation between the objective functions, a Factor Analysis combined with FMSE to dimensionality reduction was used. Research method All the steps for both stages of the methodology applied in this paper are presented below: select real time series; predict one step ahead; generate a D-Optimal mixture design; apply weights and generate mathematical models; solve the optimization problem. Main findings Using the desirability method, the optimal values were determined, obtaining approximately 79% for the compound desirability function. The proposed method presented a 16.80% higher return with a 4.98% higher risk exposure if compared against Naïve method. Implications for theory and practice The proposed methodology can be applied to any portfolio optimization study. Mixture Design studies have already been proposed for modeling portfolio optimization problems. However, the D-Optimal Design proved to be adequate, which represents less computational effort.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100225Production v.32 2022reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210119info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal,Gustavo dos SantosRomão,Estevão LuizReis,Daniel Leal de Paula Esteves dosBalestrassi,Pedro PauloPaiva,Anderson Paulo deeng2022-09-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100225Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2022-09-08T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
title A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
spellingShingle A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
Leal,Gustavo dos Santos
Portfolio optimization
D-Optimal design
Mixture design
Multivariate analysis
title_short A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
title_full A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
title_fullStr A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
title_full_unstemmed A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
title_sort A multiobjective portfolio optimization for energy assets using D-Optimal design and mixture design of experiments
author Leal,Gustavo dos Santos
author_facet Leal,Gustavo dos Santos
Romão,Estevão Luiz
Reis,Daniel Leal de Paula Esteves dos
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Paiva,Anderson Paulo de
author_role author
author2 Romão,Estevão Luiz
Reis,Daniel Leal de Paula Esteves dos
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Paiva,Anderson Paulo de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal,Gustavo dos Santos
Romão,Estevão Luiz
Reis,Daniel Leal de Paula Esteves dos
Balestrassi,Pedro Paulo
Paiva,Anderson Paulo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Portfolio optimization
D-Optimal design
Mixture design
Multivariate analysis
topic Portfolio optimization
D-Optimal design
Mixture design
Multivariate analysis
description Abstract Paper aims Frequently, researchers try to find a better way to allocate assets in order to have maximum return and low variability in a portfolio as diverse as possible. This paper aims to apply D-Optimal Design in the context of Mixture Design and portfolio optimization to efficiently select the runs of the proposed experimental design. Originality A new approach to find the optimal weights that maximize the returns and minimize the risk using D-Optimal Design was used. A multi-response optimization problem considering returns, variability and entropy as functions of the weights was proposed. However, as there is a significant correlation between the objective functions, a Factor Analysis combined with FMSE to dimensionality reduction was used. Research method All the steps for both stages of the methodology applied in this paper are presented below: select real time series; predict one step ahead; generate a D-Optimal mixture design; apply weights and generate mathematical models; solve the optimization problem. Main findings Using the desirability method, the optimal values were determined, obtaining approximately 79% for the compound desirability function. The proposed method presented a 16.80% higher return with a 4.98% higher risk exposure if compared against Naïve method. Implications for theory and practice The proposed methodology can be applied to any portfolio optimization study. Mixture Design studies have already been proposed for modeling portfolio optimization problems. However, the D-Optimal Design proved to be adequate, which represents less computational effort.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100225
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.20210119
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.32 2022
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154879963136