Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Production |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132018000100206 |
Resumo: | Abstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparison of the performances of the Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), Random Forest (RF) and the logistic regression model (LRM) for the development of credit scoring models. Originality It is not usual the use of BART methodology for the analysis of credit scoring data. The database was provided by Serasa-Experian with information regarding direct retail consumer credit operations. The use of credit bureau variables is not usual in academic papers. Research method Several models were adjusted and their performances were compared by using regular methods. Main findings The analysis confirms the superiority of the BART model over the LRM for the analyzed data. RF was superior to LRM only for the balanced sample. The best-adjusted BART model was superior to RF. Implications for theory and practice The paper suggests that the use of BART or RF may bring better results for credit scoring modelling. |
id |
ABEPRO-1_9a223a65f8be46c1aff567f083f820f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-65132018000100206 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in BrazilCreditMachine learningLogistic regressionBARTRandom ForestAbstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparison of the performances of the Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), Random Forest (RF) and the logistic regression model (LRM) for the development of credit scoring models. Originality It is not usual the use of BART methodology for the analysis of credit scoring data. The database was provided by Serasa-Experian with information regarding direct retail consumer credit operations. The use of credit bureau variables is not usual in academic papers. Research method Several models were adjusted and their performances were compared by using regular methods. Main findings The analysis confirms the superiority of the BART model over the LRM for the analyzed data. RF was superior to LRM only for the balanced sample. The best-adjusted BART model was superior to RF. Implications for theory and practice The paper suggests that the use of BART or RF may bring better results for credit scoring modelling.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132018000100206Production v.28 2018reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20170110info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito Filho,Daniel Alves deArtes,Rinaldoeng2018-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132018000100206Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2018-06-28T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
title |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil Brito Filho,Daniel Alves de Credit Machine learning Logistic regression BART Random Forest |
title_short |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
title_full |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
title_sort |
Application of bayesian additive regression trees in the development of credit scoring models in Brazil |
author |
Brito Filho,Daniel Alves de |
author_facet |
Brito Filho,Daniel Alves de Artes,Rinaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Artes,Rinaldo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brito Filho,Daniel Alves de Artes,Rinaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Credit Machine learning Logistic regression BART Random Forest |
topic |
Credit Machine learning Logistic regression BART Random Forest |
description |
Abstract Paper aims This paper presents a comparison of the performances of the Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), Random Forest (RF) and the logistic regression model (LRM) for the development of credit scoring models. Originality It is not usual the use of BART methodology for the analysis of credit scoring data. The database was provided by Serasa-Experian with information regarding direct retail consumer credit operations. The use of credit bureau variables is not usual in academic papers. Research method Several models were adjusted and their performances were compared by using regular methods. Main findings The analysis confirms the superiority of the BART model over the LRM for the analyzed data. RF was superior to LRM only for the balanced sample. The best-adjusted BART model was superior to RF. Implications for theory and practice The paper suggests that the use of BART or RF may bring better results for credit scoring modelling. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132018000100206 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132018000100206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6513.20170110 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Production v.28 2018 reponame:Production instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Production |
collection |
Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||production@editoracubo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754213154434318336 |