Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,José Olegário Rodrigues da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Fortunato,Graziela, Bastos,Sérgio Augusto Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132016000400675
Resumo: Abstract Operating cost forecasts are used in economic feasibility studies of projects and in budgeting process. Studies have pointed out that some companies are not satisfied with the budgeting process and chief executive officers want updates more frequently. In these cases, the main problem lies in the costs versus benefits. Companies seek simple and cheap forecasting methods without, at the same time, conceding in terms of quality of the resulting information. This study aims to compare operating cost forecasting models to identify the ones that are relatively easy to implement and turn out less deviation. For this purpose, we applied ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) and distributed dynamic lag models to data from a Brazilian petroleum company. The results suggest that the models have potential application, and that multivariate models fitted better and showed itself a better way to forecast costs than univariate models.
id ABEPRO-1_9b1688e6ec98aa88962b7b2ef9eeea6b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132016000400675
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the processBudgeting ProcessForecasting ModelsDynamic Lag ModelsARIMAAbstract Operating cost forecasts are used in economic feasibility studies of projects and in budgeting process. Studies have pointed out that some companies are not satisfied with the budgeting process and chief executive officers want updates more frequently. In these cases, the main problem lies in the costs versus benefits. Companies seek simple and cheap forecasting methods without, at the same time, conceding in terms of quality of the resulting information. This study aims to compare operating cost forecasting models to identify the ones that are relatively easy to implement and turn out less deviation. For this purpose, we applied ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) and distributed dynamic lag models to data from a Brazilian petroleum company. The results suggest that the models have potential application, and that multivariate models fitted better and showed itself a better way to forecast costs than univariate models.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132016000400675Production v.26 n.4 2016reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.201415info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,José Olegário Rodrigues daFortunato,GrazielaBastos,Sérgio Augusto Pereiraeng2016-12-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132016000400675Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2016-12-08T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
title Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
spellingShingle Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
Silva,José Olegário Rodrigues da
Budgeting Process
Forecasting Models
Dynamic Lag Models
ARIMA
title_short Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
title_full Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
title_fullStr Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
title_full_unstemmed Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
title_sort Operating cost budgeting methods: quantitative methods to improve the process
author Silva,José Olegário Rodrigues da
author_facet Silva,José Olegário Rodrigues da
Fortunato,Graziela
Bastos,Sérgio Augusto Pereira
author_role author
author2 Fortunato,Graziela
Bastos,Sérgio Augusto Pereira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,José Olegário Rodrigues da
Fortunato,Graziela
Bastos,Sérgio Augusto Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Budgeting Process
Forecasting Models
Dynamic Lag Models
ARIMA
topic Budgeting Process
Forecasting Models
Dynamic Lag Models
ARIMA
description Abstract Operating cost forecasts are used in economic feasibility studies of projects and in budgeting process. Studies have pointed out that some companies are not satisfied with the budgeting process and chief executive officers want updates more frequently. In these cases, the main problem lies in the costs versus benefits. Companies seek simple and cheap forecasting methods without, at the same time, conceding in terms of quality of the resulting information. This study aims to compare operating cost forecasting models to identify the ones that are relatively easy to implement and turn out less deviation. For this purpose, we applied ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) and distributed dynamic lag models to data from a Brazilian petroleum company. The results suggest that the models have potential application, and that multivariate models fitted better and showed itself a better way to forecast costs than univariate models.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132016000400675
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132016000400675
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.201415
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.26 n.4 2016
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154083045376