Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz, Gontijo, Leila Amaral, Masiero, Fabrício Campos, Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Produção Online
Texto Completo: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712
Resumo: Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the  power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller.
id ABEPRO-2_76755dc0b2aafa74033e307e0ec455ee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1712
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-2
network_name_str Revista Produção Online
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machineryEstudo comparativo da usabilidade de comandos direcionais para duas concepções de máquinas agrícolasErgonomics. Operation. Error.Ergonomia. Operação. Erro.Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the  power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller.O estado de Santa Catarina apresentou um expressivo crescimento em sua frota de máquinas agrícolas nos últimos 40 anos. Pelas origens históricas, o estado experimentou uma  agricultura familiar forte que se desenvolveu em pequenas propriedades. Essa reduzida dimensão das propriedades rurais impulsionou a aquisição de máquinas agrícolas de pequeno porte tais como os motocultivadores. Estima-se que em Santa Catarina existam mais de 20 mil máquinas dessa natureza. Pela concepção inicial dessa máquina seu emprego destina-se a operações com deslocamento em pé, possuindo para isso comandos dimensionados para a postura na vertical. Porém grande parcela dos motocultivadores é empregada no transporte de carga e pessoal, através da adaptação de um implemento que possibilita a condução na posição sentada. Essa modificação é incompleta, pois não possibilita a instalação de volante para manobras. Assim essa inadequação do comando aumenta a dificuldade na condução do veículo e pode potencializar o erro humano, levando ao acidente.  Buscando comparar a usabilidade e o índice de erros no acionamento de comandos de motocultivadores e de tratores, no trabalho utilizou-se de dois métodos: análise pelo modelo Usa- Design (U-D© )e teste de usabilidade. Um painel posicionado à frente das duas máquinas agrícolas simulou obstáculos surgindo à direita ou esquerda do operador, em situação de subida ou descida, e foi observada a reação do mesmo ao estímulo. A amostra de 53 voluntários comprovou que para todos os grupos (níveis de experiência) o erro foi maior para o motocultivador.  O trator apresentou 5,7 % de erro enquanto que no motocultivador esse valor foi de 49,1 %. O resultado encontrado pelo modelo Usa Design concordou com os encontrados no teste e apontou graves deficiências em aspectos funcionais e de segurança no motocultivador. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2015-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfaudio/mpeghttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/171210.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712Revista Produção Online; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2015); 830-858Revista Produção Online; v. 15 n. 3 (2015); 830-8581676-1901reponame:Revista Produção Onlineinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROporhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1302https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1303Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga, Ricardo KozoroskiMerino, Eugenio Andrés DíazGontijo, Leila AmaralMasiero, Fabrício CamposMerino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz2015-11-11T17:25:24Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1712Revistahttp://producaoonline.org.br/rpoPUBhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/oai||producaoonline@gmail.com1676-19011676-1901opendoar:2015-11-11T17:25:24Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
Estudo comparativo da usabilidade de comandos direcionais para duas concepções de máquinas agrícolas
title Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
spellingShingle Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski
Ergonomics. Operation. Error.
Ergonomia. Operação. Erro.
title_short Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
title_full Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
title_fullStr Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
title_sort Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
author Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski
author_facet Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski
Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz
Gontijo, Leila Amaral
Masiero, Fabrício Campos
Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz
author_role author
author2 Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz
Gontijo, Leila Amaral
Masiero, Fabrício Campos
Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski
Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz
Gontijo, Leila Amaral
Masiero, Fabrício Campos
Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ergonomics. Operation. Error.
Ergonomia. Operação. Erro.
topic Ergonomics. Operation. Error.
Ergonomia. Operação. Erro.
description Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the  power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712
10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712
url https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1302
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1303
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Online
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Online
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
audio/mpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2015); 830-858
Revista Produção Online; v. 15 n. 3 (2015); 830-858
1676-1901
reponame:Revista Produção Online
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Revista Produção Online
collection Revista Produção Online
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||producaoonline@gmail.com
_version_ 1761536949371273216