Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Produção Online |
Texto Completo: | https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712 |
Resumo: | Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller. |
id |
ABEPRO-2_76755dc0b2aafa74033e307e0ec455ee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1712 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Produção Online |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machineryEstudo comparativo da usabilidade de comandos direcionais para duas concepções de máquinas agrícolasErgonomics. Operation. Error.Ergonomia. Operação. Erro.Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller.O estado de Santa Catarina apresentou um expressivo crescimento em sua frota de máquinas agrícolas nos últimos 40 anos. Pelas origens históricas, o estado experimentou uma agricultura familiar forte que se desenvolveu em pequenas propriedades. Essa reduzida dimensão das propriedades rurais impulsionou a aquisição de máquinas agrícolas de pequeno porte tais como os motocultivadores. Estima-se que em Santa Catarina existam mais de 20 mil máquinas dessa natureza. Pela concepção inicial dessa máquina seu emprego destina-se a operações com deslocamento em pé, possuindo para isso comandos dimensionados para a postura na vertical. Porém grande parcela dos motocultivadores é empregada no transporte de carga e pessoal, através da adaptação de um implemento que possibilita a condução na posição sentada. Essa modificação é incompleta, pois não possibilita a instalação de volante para manobras. Assim essa inadequação do comando aumenta a dificuldade na condução do veículo e pode potencializar o erro humano, levando ao acidente. Buscando comparar a usabilidade e o índice de erros no acionamento de comandos de motocultivadores e de tratores, no trabalho utilizou-se de dois métodos: análise pelo modelo Usa- Design (U-D© )e teste de usabilidade. Um painel posicionado à frente das duas máquinas agrícolas simulou obstáculos surgindo à direita ou esquerda do operador, em situação de subida ou descida, e foi observada a reação do mesmo ao estímulo. A amostra de 53 voluntários comprovou que para todos os grupos (níveis de experiência) o erro foi maior para o motocultivador. O trator apresentou 5,7 % de erro enquanto que no motocultivador esse valor foi de 49,1 %. O resultado encontrado pelo modelo Usa Design concordou com os encontrados no teste e apontou graves deficiências em aspectos funcionais e de segurança no motocultivador. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2015-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfaudio/mpeghttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/171210.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712Revista Produção Online; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2015); 830-858Revista Produção Online; v. 15 n. 3 (2015); 830-8581676-1901reponame:Revista Produção Onlineinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROporhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1302https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1303Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga, Ricardo KozoroskiMerino, Eugenio Andrés DíazGontijo, Leila AmaralMasiero, Fabrício CamposMerino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz2015-11-11T17:25:24Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1712Revistahttp://producaoonline.org.br/rpoPUBhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/oai||producaoonline@gmail.com1676-19011676-1901opendoar:2015-11-11T17:25:24Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery Estudo comparativo da usabilidade de comandos direcionais para duas concepções de máquinas agrícolas |
title |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski Ergonomics. Operation. Error. Ergonomia. Operação. Erro. |
title_short |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
title_full |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
title_sort |
Comparative study of the usability of directional commands for two different conceptions of agricultural machinery |
author |
Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski |
author_facet |
Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz Gontijo, Leila Amaral Masiero, Fabrício Campos Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz Gontijo, Leila Amaral Masiero, Fabrício Campos Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veiga, Ricardo Kozoroski Merino, Eugenio Andrés Díaz Gontijo, Leila Amaral Masiero, Fabrício Campos Merino, Giselle Schmidt Alves Díaz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ergonomics. Operation. Error. Ergonomia. Operação. Erro. |
topic |
Ergonomics. Operation. Error. Ergonomia. Operação. Erro. |
description |
Santa Catarina showed a significant increase in its fleet of agricultural machinery in the past 40 years. For the historical origins, the state experienced a strong farm household that grows in small portions of land. This small size of farms boosted the purchase of farm machinery such as small power tillers. It is estimated that in Santa Catarina there are more than 20,000 machines like these. The initial design of this machine its use is intended for operations on foot position for possessing it commands designed for the walking posture. But a large proportion of power tillers is used to transport cargo and personnel, by adapting implement that allows driving in the sitting position. This modification is incomplete because it does not allow the installation of steering wheel. Thus the inadequacy of command increases the difficulty in driving the vehicle and may potentiate human error, leading to the accident. To compare the usability and rate of errors in triggering commands power tiller and tractors, the work used two methods: analysis uses the model Usa-Design (U-D©) and usability testing. A panel was positioned in front of the two agricultural machines simulated obstacles appearing on the right or left side of operator, in a position to rise or fall, and observed the reaction to the same stimulus. A sample of 53 volunteers showed that for all groups (experience levels ) the error was greater for the power tiller. The tractor had 5.7 % error while the power tiller this value was 49.1 %. The results found by U-D© model was similar with the found in the test and pointed out serious deficiencies in functional and safety aspects of power tiller. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712 10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712 |
url |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1712 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1302 https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1712/1303 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Online info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Produção Online |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf audio/mpeg |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Produção Online; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2015); 830-858 Revista Produção Online; v. 15 n. 3 (2015); 830-858 1676-1901 reponame:Revista Produção Online instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Revista Produção Online |
collection |
Revista Produção Online |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||producaoonline@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1761536949371273216 |