Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gumz, Jonathan
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fettermann, Diego Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Produção Online
DOI: 10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179
Texto Completo: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179
Resumo: The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations.
id ABEPRO-2_88869fa9ae6fc7d1beb5d60ff37a83fc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4179
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-2
network_name_str Revista Produção Online
spelling Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptanceBenefícios e barreiras para aceitação de medidores inteligentes residenciaisSmart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations.Programas de implantação de medidores inteligentes nas residências são fundamentais para se atingirem as metas de modernização da rede elétrica e uso racional das fontes de energia. Porém, além da implantação dos aparelhos nas residências é necessária a aceitação dos consumidores, que possuem papel fundamental na redução do uso de energia elétrica. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar na literatura quais fatores influenciam positivamente (benefícios) e negativamente (barreiras) para a aceitação. Para isso, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura usando o método PRISMA (Preferred Research Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses). Foram analisados 172 artigos, dos quais 42 são estudos aplicados. Os resultados sugerem 26 fatores diferentes que influenciam a aceitação, sendo os benefícios mais importantes “melhor gerenciamento de energia através do feedback”, “eco-preocupação” e “expectativa de ganho financeiro”, já as barreiras mais relevantes são “segurança ameaçada”, “falta de familiaridade” e “custos associados”. As pesquisas de aceitação estão ainda muito concentradas na Europa, EUA e Austrália, sendo necessário que países em desenvolvimento, que lideram a expansão do uso de fontes renováveis em suas matrizes energéticas, também considerem investigar a aceitação local de medidores para obter sucesso em suas implementações.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2021-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfvideo/mp4https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/417910.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179Revista Produção Online; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021); 131-156Revista Produção Online; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 131-1561676-1901reponame:Revista Produção Onlineinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROporhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2011https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2012Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGumz, JonathanFettermann, Diego Castro2021-03-16T02:35:06Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4179Revistahttp://producaoonline.org.br/rpoPUBhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/oai||producaoonline@gmail.com1676-19011676-1901opendoar:2021-03-16T02:35:06Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Benefícios e barreiras para aceitação de medidores inteligentes residenciais
title Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
spellingShingle Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Gumz, Jonathan
Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.
Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.
Gumz, Jonathan
Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.
Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.
title_short Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
title_full Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
title_fullStr Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
title_sort Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
author Gumz, Jonathan
author_facet Gumz, Jonathan
Gumz, Jonathan
Fettermann, Diego Castro
Fettermann, Diego Castro
author_role author
author2 Fettermann, Diego Castro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gumz, Jonathan
Fettermann, Diego Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.
Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.
topic Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.
Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.
description The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179
10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179
url https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2011
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Online
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Online
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
video/mp4
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021); 131-156
Revista Produção Online; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 131-156
1676-1901
reponame:Revista Produção Online
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Revista Produção Online
collection Revista Produção Online
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||producaoonline@gmail.com
_version_ 1822176310008479744
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179