Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Produção Online |
DOI: | 10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179 |
Resumo: | The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations. |
id |
ABEPRO-2_88869fa9ae6fc7d1beb5d60ff37a83fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4179 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Produção Online |
spelling |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptanceBenefícios e barreiras para aceitação de medidores inteligentes residenciaisSmart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method.Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA.The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations.Programas de implantação de medidores inteligentes nas residências são fundamentais para se atingirem as metas de modernização da rede elétrica e uso racional das fontes de energia. Porém, além da implantação dos aparelhos nas residências é necessária a aceitação dos consumidores, que possuem papel fundamental na redução do uso de energia elétrica. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar na literatura quais fatores influenciam positivamente (benefícios) e negativamente (barreiras) para a aceitação. Para isso, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura usando o método PRISMA (Preferred Research Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses). Foram analisados 172 artigos, dos quais 42 são estudos aplicados. Os resultados sugerem 26 fatores diferentes que influenciam a aceitação, sendo os benefícios mais importantes “melhor gerenciamento de energia através do feedback”, “eco-preocupação” e “expectativa de ganho financeiro”, já as barreiras mais relevantes são “segurança ameaçada”, “falta de familiaridade” e “custos associados”. As pesquisas de aceitação estão ainda muito concentradas na Europa, EUA e Austrália, sendo necessário que países em desenvolvimento, que lideram a expansão do uso de fontes renováveis em suas matrizes energéticas, também considerem investigar a aceitação local de medidores para obter sucesso em suas implementações.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2021-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfvideo/mp4https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/417910.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179Revista Produção Online; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021); 131-156Revista Produção Online; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 131-1561676-1901reponame:Revista Produção Onlineinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROporhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2011https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2012Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGumz, JonathanFettermann, Diego Castro2021-03-16T02:35:06Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4179Revistahttp://producaoonline.org.br/rpoPUBhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/oai||producaoonline@gmail.com1676-19011676-1901opendoar:2021-03-16T02:35:06Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance Benefícios e barreiras para aceitação de medidores inteligentes residenciais |
title |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
spellingShingle |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance Gumz, Jonathan Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method. Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA. Gumz, Jonathan Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method. Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA. |
title_short |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
title_full |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
title_fullStr |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
title_sort |
Benefits and barriers for household smart meters’ acceptance |
author |
Gumz, Jonathan |
author_facet |
Gumz, Jonathan Gumz, Jonathan Fettermann, Diego Castro Fettermann, Diego Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fettermann, Diego Castro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gumz, Jonathan Fettermann, Diego Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method. Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA. |
topic |
Smart meters. Acceptance. PRISMA Method. Medidores inteligentes. Aceitação. Método PRISMA. |
description |
The implementation of smart meters in homes is essential to achieve the goals of modernization of the electricity grid and rational use of energy sources. However, in addition to the implantation of devices in homes, it is necessary to have the consumers’ acceptance due to their fundamental role in reducing electricity usage. This study investigates in the literature which factors influence it positively (benefits) and negatively (barriers) for acceptance. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out using the PRISMA method (Preferred research items for systematic review and meta-analyses). A total of 172 articles were surveyed, of which 42 are applied studies. The results obtained 26 different factors that influence acceptance, with the most important benefits being “better energy management through feedback,” “eco-concern,” and “expectation of financial gain.” In contrast, the most relevant barriers are “threatened security,” “lack of familiarity,” and “associated costs.” Acceptance surveys are still highly concentrated in Europe, the USA, and Australia. It is necessary that developing countries, which are leading the expansion of renewable sources in their energy matrices, also consider investigating the local acceptance of meters to be successful in their implementations. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179 10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179 |
url |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2011 https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4179/2012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Online info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Produção Online |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf video/mp4 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Produção Online; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021); 131-156 Revista Produção Online; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 131-156 1676-1901 reponame:Revista Produção Online instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Revista Produção Online |
collection |
Revista Produção Online |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||producaoonline@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822176310008479744 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14488/1676-1901.v21i1.4179 |