Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramalho, Susan Catieri
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Produção Online
Texto Completo: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357
Resumo: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the environmental performance of a medium-sized company that provides services for surface treatment of aluminum. The treatment is known as anodizing. The research method was qualitative numerical modeling. The environmental performance of the company was organized into five constructs: atmosphere, wastewater, energy and natural resources, solid waste, and legislation and management. Nineteen indicators were chosen to explain the five constructs. Ten employees of the company prioritized the constructs and evaluated the situation of the indicators by means of a scale of assessment. By means of a mathematical model, the general performance of the environmental operation was calculated at 74.5% of the maximum possible. The indicators that most contributed to the performance not to reach 100% were consumption of electricity and water consumption. The construct of worse performance was natural and energy resources. These are the priorities for future environmental improvement actions that the company may promote.
id ABEPRO-2_ba713534c596582778109a34495b372a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1357
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-2
network_name_str Revista Produção Online
repository_id_str
spelling Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatmentAvaliação do desempenho ambiental de uma empresa de tratamento superficial de alumínioEnvironmental performance. Environmental Management. Environmental Impacts.Desempenho Ambiental. Gestão Ambiental. Impactos Ambientais.The purpose of this article was to evaluate the environmental performance of a medium-sized company that provides services for surface treatment of aluminum. The treatment is known as anodizing. The research method was qualitative numerical modeling. The environmental performance of the company was organized into five constructs: atmosphere, wastewater, energy and natural resources, solid waste, and legislation and management. Nineteen indicators were chosen to explain the five constructs. Ten employees of the company prioritized the constructs and evaluated the situation of the indicators by means of a scale of assessment. By means of a mathematical model, the general performance of the environmental operation was calculated at 74.5% of the maximum possible. The indicators that most contributed to the performance not to reach 100% were consumption of electricity and water consumption. The construct of worse performance was natural and energy resources. These are the priorities for future environmental improvement actions that the company may promote.O objetivo deste artigo foi avaliar o desempenho ambiental de uma empresa de tamanho médio que presta serviços de tratamento superficial de alumínio. O tratamento é conhecido como anodização. O método de pesquisa foi a modelagem numérica qualitativa. O desempenho ambiental da empresa foi organizado em cinco construtos: atmosfera, efluentes, recursos naturais e energéticos, resíduos sólidos, e legislação e gestão. Dezenove indicadores foram escolhidos para explicar os cinco construtos. Dez colaboradores da empresa priorizaram os construtos e avaliaram a situação dos indicadores por meio de uma escala de avaliação. Por meio de modelo matemático, o desempenho geral ambiental da operação foi calculado em 74,5% do máximo possível. Os indicadores que mais contribuíram para que o desempenho não fosse de 100% foram consumo de energia elétrica e consumo de água. O construto de pior desempenho foi Recursos Naturais e Energéticos. Estas são as prioridades para futuras ações de melhoria ambiental que a empresa venha a promover.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2013-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfaudio/mpeghttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/135710.14488/1676-1901.v13i3.1357Revista Produção Online; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013); 1034-1059Revista Produção Online; v. 13 n. 3 (2013); 1034-10591676-1901reponame:Revista Produção Onlineinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROporhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357/1054https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357/1055Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Produção Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamalho, Susan CatieriSellitto, Miguel Afonso2015-11-11T17:25:42Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1357Revistahttp://producaoonline.org.br/rpoPUBhttps://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/oai||producaoonline@gmail.com1676-19011676-1901opendoar:2015-11-11T17:25:42Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
Avaliação do desempenho ambiental de uma empresa de tratamento superficial de alumínio
title Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
spellingShingle Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
Ramalho, Susan Catieri
Environmental performance. Environmental Management. Environmental Impacts.
Desempenho Ambiental. Gestão Ambiental. Impactos Ambientais.
title_short Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
title_full Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
title_fullStr Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
title_full_unstemmed Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
title_sort Environmental performance assessment of a company of aluminum surface treatment
author Ramalho, Susan Catieri
author_facet Ramalho, Susan Catieri
Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
author_role author
author2 Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramalho, Susan Catieri
Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental performance. Environmental Management. Environmental Impacts.
Desempenho Ambiental. Gestão Ambiental. Impactos Ambientais.
topic Environmental performance. Environmental Management. Environmental Impacts.
Desempenho Ambiental. Gestão Ambiental. Impactos Ambientais.
description The purpose of this article was to evaluate the environmental performance of a medium-sized company that provides services for surface treatment of aluminum. The treatment is known as anodizing. The research method was qualitative numerical modeling. The environmental performance of the company was organized into five constructs: atmosphere, wastewater, energy and natural resources, solid waste, and legislation and management. Nineteen indicators were chosen to explain the five constructs. Ten employees of the company prioritized the constructs and evaluated the situation of the indicators by means of a scale of assessment. By means of a mathematical model, the general performance of the environmental operation was calculated at 74.5% of the maximum possible. The indicators that most contributed to the performance not to reach 100% were consumption of electricity and water consumption. The construct of worse performance was natural and energy resources. These are the priorities for future environmental improvement actions that the company may promote.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357
10.14488/1676-1901.v13i3.1357
url https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/1676-1901.v13i3.1357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357/1054
https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/1357/1055
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Produção Online
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Produção Online
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
audio/mpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013); 1034-1059
Revista Produção Online; v. 13 n. 3 (2013); 1034-1059
1676-1901
reponame:Revista Produção Online
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Revista Produção Online
collection Revista Produção Online
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Produção Online - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||producaoonline@gmail.com
_version_ 1761536948903608320