Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Vanessa B.S.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Morais, Danielle Costa, De Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6
Resumo: In Brazil, the hydrographic basin committees are the centre of decision for water resource management in their respective basins. The committee members, who represent the public sector, water users and civil society, must decide about complex issues, requesting the consideration of multiple aspects: economic, social and environmental. Given the complexity of the decision-making process, it is advantageous to have a decision support system that guarantees transparency, rapidness and, specially, a structured analysis of the problem, incorporating all aspects of the situation. This paper presents a group decision making model based on multicriteria analyses to support the members of a hydrographic basin committee to prioritize complex issues, in special activities to control the environmental degradation The proposed model works through two steps: firstly is used the PROMETHEE II method to achieve the individual rankings of alternatives, and secondly, the individual rankings of alternatives are aggregated to attain the global ranking, applying the ELECTRE IV method, reflecting the preference of the group.
id ABEPRO_3e6cda12f79fc192c9f522e1684f656e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/92
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision ApproachGroup decisionPROMETHEE IIELECTRE IVHydrographic basin committeesWater resources management.In Brazil, the hydrographic basin committees are the centre of decision for water resource management in their respective basins. The committee members, who represent the public sector, water users and civil society, must decide about complex issues, requesting the consideration of multiple aspects: economic, social and environmental. Given the complexity of the decision-making process, it is advantageous to have a decision support system that guarantees transparency, rapidness and, specially, a structured analysis of the problem, incorporating all aspects of the situation. This paper presents a group decision making model based on multicriteria analyses to support the members of a hydrographic basin committee to prioritize complex issues, in special activities to control the environmental degradation The proposed model works through two steps: firstly is used the PROMETHEE II method to achieve the individual rankings of alternatives, and secondly, the individual rankings of alternatives are aggregated to attain the global ranking, applying the ELECTRE IV method, reflecting the preference of the group.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2010-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2010): July, 2010; 123-1392237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6/bjopm_92Silva, Vanessa B.S.Morais, Danielle CostaDe Almeida, Adiel Teixeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-04-04T07:29:37Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/92Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:04.084040Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
title Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
spellingShingle Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
Silva, Vanessa B.S.
Group decision
PROMETHEE II
ELECTRE IV
Hydrographic basin committees
Water resources management.
title_short Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
title_full Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
title_fullStr Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
title_sort Prioritizing Complex Issues of Hydrographic Basin Committees by Group Decision Approach
author Silva, Vanessa B.S.
author_facet Silva, Vanessa B.S.
Morais, Danielle Costa
De Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
author_role author
author2 Morais, Danielle Costa
De Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Vanessa B.S.
Morais, Danielle Costa
De Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Group decision
PROMETHEE II
ELECTRE IV
Hydrographic basin committees
Water resources management.
topic Group decision
PROMETHEE II
ELECTRE IV
Hydrographic basin committees
Water resources management.
description In Brazil, the hydrographic basin committees are the centre of decision for water resource management in their respective basins. The committee members, who represent the public sector, water users and civil society, must decide about complex issues, requesting the consideration of multiple aspects: economic, social and environmental. Given the complexity of the decision-making process, it is advantageous to have a decision support system that guarantees transparency, rapidness and, specially, a structured analysis of the problem, incorporating all aspects of the situation. This paper presents a group decision making model based on multicriteria analyses to support the members of a hydrographic basin committee to prioritize complex issues, in special activities to control the environmental degradation The proposed model works through two steps: firstly is used the PROMETHEE II method to achieve the individual rankings of alternatives, and secondly, the individual rankings of alternatives are aggregated to attain the global ranking, applying the ELECTRE IV method, reflecting the preference of the group.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V7N1A6/bjopm_92
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2010): July, 2010; 123-139
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051459991240704