Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lartey, Peter Yao
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Kong, Yusheng, Afriyie, Stephen, Santosh, Rupa Jaladi, Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848
Resumo: Goal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568.  The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments.
id ABEPRO_3fffa0770333ee57c6877aba821a5a91
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/848
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and PeculiaritiesGood GovernaceAccountabilityComplianceIndependenceGoal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568.  The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2020-02-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/84810.14488/BJOPM.2020.001Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): March, 2020; 1-142237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848/917Copyright (c) 2020 Peter Yao Lartey, Yusheng Kong, Stephen Afriyie, Rupa Jaladi Santosh, Fatoumata Binta Maci Bahinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLartey, Peter YaoKong, YushengAfriyie, StephenSantosh, Rupa JaladiBah, Fatoumata Binta Maci2020-02-12T10:28:38Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/848Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:22.770754Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
title Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
spellingShingle Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
Lartey, Peter Yao
Good Governace
Accountability
Compliance
Independence
title_short Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
title_full Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
title_fullStr Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
title_sort Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
author Lartey, Peter Yao
author_facet Lartey, Peter Yao
Kong, Yusheng
Afriyie, Stephen
Santosh, Rupa Jaladi
Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci
author_role author
author2 Kong, Yusheng
Afriyie, Stephen
Santosh, Rupa Jaladi
Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lartey, Peter Yao
Kong, Yusheng
Afriyie, Stephen
Santosh, Rupa Jaladi
Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Good Governace
Accountability
Compliance
Independence
topic Good Governace
Accountability
Compliance
Independence
description Goal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568.  The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848
10.14488/BJOPM.2020.001
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/BJOPM.2020.001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848/917
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): March, 2020; 1-14
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051461427789824