Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848 |
Resumo: | Goal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568. The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments. |
id |
ABEPRO_3fffa0770333ee57c6877aba821a5a91 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/848 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and PeculiaritiesGood GovernaceAccountabilityComplianceIndependenceGoal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568. The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2020-02-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/84810.14488/BJOPM.2020.001Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): March, 2020; 1-142237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848/917Copyright (c) 2020 Peter Yao Lartey, Yusheng Kong, Stephen Afriyie, Rupa Jaladi Santosh, Fatoumata Binta Maci Bahinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLartey, Peter YaoKong, YushengAfriyie, StephenSantosh, Rupa JaladiBah, Fatoumata Binta Maci2020-02-12T10:28:38Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/848Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:22.770754Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
title |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
spellingShingle |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities Lartey, Peter Yao Good Governace Accountability Compliance Independence |
title_short |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
title_full |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
title_fullStr |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
title_sort |
Corporate Governance Issues in the Public Sector: Board Perspective and Peculiarities |
author |
Lartey, Peter Yao |
author_facet |
Lartey, Peter Yao Kong, Yusheng Afriyie, Stephen Santosh, Rupa Jaladi Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kong, Yusheng Afriyie, Stephen Santosh, Rupa Jaladi Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lartey, Peter Yao Kong, Yusheng Afriyie, Stephen Santosh, Rupa Jaladi Bah, Fatoumata Binta Maci |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Good Governace Accountability Compliance Independence |
topic |
Good Governace Accountability Compliance Independence |
description |
Goal: the objective of the paper is to extend the discussions on corporate governance to the public sector and examine good governance from a Ghanaian institutional context. Design / Methodology / Approach: literature is based on relevant theoretical concepts and seven explanatory variables of corporate governance. Primary data was abstained through structured questionnaires administered to public servants from the Ministries, Departments and Agencies– MDA’s in Accra. Ordinary Least Square multiple regression was employed to analyze a total valid sample of 568. The findings represent the opinions of board of directors, internal auditors, senior management and employees. Results: the empirical result shows that audit committees, leadership, board effectiveness, accountability and directors’ qualification are strong determinants of good governance in public organizations. However, board size has no impact on good governance when board independence is negative. There is evidence that international corporate governance principles are reasonably visible without any significant deviations. Limitations of the investigation: The study is empirically limited with the absence of key variables such as corruption, ethnicity and tribal politics in public organizations in Ghana. These are major factors associated with institutional governance in developing countries. Practical Implications: the study observed a negative relationship between board independence and good governance attributed to lack of board diversity. The study implies that gender balanced boards composed of higher ratio of female directors could enhance decision-making and guarantee board effectiveness. Originality / Value: the study emphasizes that public and private organizations share almost similar governance indicators, considering the model estimation. There is evidence that corporate governance is gaining popularity in the public sector, a discussion that is often limited to the private sector. The study contributes to the limited existing findings on the subject from a Ghanaian institutional context. Finally, the results validate many empirical opinions about the negative relationship between good governance and board size from different institutional environments. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848 10.14488/BJOPM.2020.001 |
url |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14488/BJOPM.2020.001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/848/917 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): March, 2020; 1-14 2237-8960 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjopm.journal@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051461427789824 |