Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817
Resumo: Goal: The purpose of this paper is to build the structure of a multicriteria decision model that supports definition and prioritization of strategic initiatives by an institution performing in the prevention of natural disasters. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodological process is adopted to build a multicriteria evaluation model. A two-phase process is followed, employing a top-down approach, based on Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), in combination with the Multi Attribute Value Theory (MAVT) method. The participants of the MCDA process were experts of the control room in the case study institution. Results: The proposed methodology not only helped decision makers to enumerate a number of strategic initiatives to accomplish the organizational objective, but also helped them to establish a structured procedure to prioritize these initiatives. Limitations: Absence of a criterion related to the organization budget in the model; limited scope of participation in the process; absence of quantitative criteria. Practical implications: The major practical contributions are as follows: an structured model that supports the strategic planning process; a better allocation of resources (human, financial, and materials) in projects that are truly aligned with the strategic objective of the organization; the organizational learning coming from the exercise of reflection on values, objectives and preferences; and the legitimacy of decisions as a result of the participative character of the construction process of the model. Originality/Value: In this study, a multicriteria evaluation model is structured and applied as support for strategic decision making in the context of a natural disaster early warning system. The model has a significant application potential, since it encourages the adoption of structured decision support methods rather than traditional empirical decision making. Thus, the value of the study lies in the contribution that the proposed model can offer to more effective disaster prevention.
id ABEPRO_dca6c70b8d043e44c9a719ba87827e97
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/817
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster preventionDisaster preventionEarly warning systemValue-Focused ThinkingMulticriteria decision analysisGoal: The purpose of this paper is to build the structure of a multicriteria decision model that supports definition and prioritization of strategic initiatives by an institution performing in the prevention of natural disasters. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodological process is adopted to build a multicriteria evaluation model. A two-phase process is followed, employing a top-down approach, based on Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), in combination with the Multi Attribute Value Theory (MAVT) method. The participants of the MCDA process were experts of the control room in the case study institution. Results: The proposed methodology not only helped decision makers to enumerate a number of strategic initiatives to accomplish the organizational objective, but also helped them to establish a structured procedure to prioritize these initiatives. Limitations: Absence of a criterion related to the organization budget in the model; limited scope of participation in the process; absence of quantitative criteria. Practical implications: The major practical contributions are as follows: an structured model that supports the strategic planning process; a better allocation of resources (human, financial, and materials) in projects that are truly aligned with the strategic objective of the organization; the organizational learning coming from the exercise of reflection on values, objectives and preferences; and the legitimacy of decisions as a result of the participative character of the construction process of the model. Originality/Value: In this study, a multicriteria evaluation model is structured and applied as support for strategic decision making in the context of a natural disaster early warning system. The model has a significant application potential, since it encourages the adoption of structured decision support methods rather than traditional empirical decision making. Thus, the value of the study lies in the contribution that the proposed model can offer to more effective disaster prevention.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2019-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articletext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/81710.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n3.a10Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019): September, 2019; 473-4892237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817/866https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817/867Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni daBelderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra2021-07-13T14:14:17Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/817Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:22.250742Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
title Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
spellingShingle Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da
Disaster prevention
Early warning system
Value-Focused Thinking
Multicriteria decision analysis
title_short Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
title_full Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
title_fullStr Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
title_sort Prioritization of strategic initiatives in the context of natural disaster prevention
author Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da
author_facet Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da
Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra
author_role author
author2 Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Glayse Ferreira Perroni da
Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Disaster prevention
Early warning system
Value-Focused Thinking
Multicriteria decision analysis
topic Disaster prevention
Early warning system
Value-Focused Thinking
Multicriteria decision analysis
description Goal: The purpose of this paper is to build the structure of a multicriteria decision model that supports definition and prioritization of strategic initiatives by an institution performing in the prevention of natural disasters. Design/Methodology/Approach: The Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodological process is adopted to build a multicriteria evaluation model. A two-phase process is followed, employing a top-down approach, based on Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), in combination with the Multi Attribute Value Theory (MAVT) method. The participants of the MCDA process were experts of the control room in the case study institution. Results: The proposed methodology not only helped decision makers to enumerate a number of strategic initiatives to accomplish the organizational objective, but also helped them to establish a structured procedure to prioritize these initiatives. Limitations: Absence of a criterion related to the organization budget in the model; limited scope of participation in the process; absence of quantitative criteria. Practical implications: The major practical contributions are as follows: an structured model that supports the strategic planning process; a better allocation of resources (human, financial, and materials) in projects that are truly aligned with the strategic objective of the organization; the organizational learning coming from the exercise of reflection on values, objectives and preferences; and the legitimacy of decisions as a result of the participative character of the construction process of the model. Originality/Value: In this study, a multicriteria evaluation model is structured and applied as support for strategic decision making in the context of a natural disaster early warning system. The model has a significant application potential, since it encourages the adoption of structured decision support methods rather than traditional empirical decision making. Thus, the value of the study lies in the contribution that the proposed model can offer to more effective disaster prevention.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n3.a10
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n3.a10
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817/866
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/817/867
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019): September, 2019; 473-489
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051461409964032