STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Glória,R. M.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Motta,T. M., Silva,P. V. O., Costa,P. da, Brandt,E. M. F., Souza,C. L., Chernicharo,C. A. L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322016000400713
Resumo: Abstract UASB reactors are a common technology for wastewater treatment. However, certain disadvantages must be considered. One of the disadvantages relates to the presence of dissolved gases, hydrogen sulfide and methane, in the effluent, which can potentially be released into the atmosphere. This can cause malodours and contribute to the greenhouse effect. In this perspective, this work investigated alternative techniques to minimize these disadvantages: air stripping inside the settling compartment; and a dissipation chamber immediately after the reactor outlet. Results achieved with the air stripping technique showed low removal efficiencies for methane, around 30%, and in the range of 40 to 60% for hydrogen sulfide. On the other hand, the removal efficiencies obtained with the dissipation chamber technique were much higher, consistently reaching 60% or more for both gases, plus a relatively lower exhaust flow. For the best operational condition tested, median removal efficiencies of 73 and 97% were observed for dissolved methane and dissolved sulfide, respectively.
id ABEQ-1_18316a98dcfb0124af87839bf1310700
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322016000400713
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTSDissipation chamberStrippingDissolved methaneHydrogen sulphideGaseous emissionsUASB reactorAbstract UASB reactors are a common technology for wastewater treatment. However, certain disadvantages must be considered. One of the disadvantages relates to the presence of dissolved gases, hydrogen sulfide and methane, in the effluent, which can potentially be released into the atmosphere. This can cause malodours and contribute to the greenhouse effect. In this perspective, this work investigated alternative techniques to minimize these disadvantages: air stripping inside the settling compartment; and a dissipation chamber immediately after the reactor outlet. Results achieved with the air stripping technique showed low removal efficiencies for methane, around 30%, and in the range of 40 to 60% for hydrogen sulfide. On the other hand, the removal efficiencies obtained with the dissipation chamber technique were much higher, consistently reaching 60% or more for both gases, plus a relatively lower exhaust flow. For the best operational condition tested, median removal efficiencies of 73 and 97% were observed for dissolved methane and dissolved sulfide, respectively.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322016000400713Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.33 n.4 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGlória,R. M.Motta,T. M.Silva,P. V. O.Costa,P. daBrandt,E. M. F.Souza,C. L.Chernicharo,C. A. L.eng2017-03-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322016000400713Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2017-03-13T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
title STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
spellingShingle STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
Glória,R. M.
Dissipation chamber
Stripping
Dissolved methane
Hydrogen sulphide
Gaseous emissions
UASB reactor
title_short STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
title_full STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
title_fullStr STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
title_full_unstemmed STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
title_sort STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS
author Glória,R. M.
author_facet Glória,R. M.
Motta,T. M.
Silva,P. V. O.
Costa,P. da
Brandt,E. M. F.
Souza,C. L.
Chernicharo,C. A. L.
author_role author
author2 Motta,T. M.
Silva,P. V. O.
Costa,P. da
Brandt,E. M. F.
Souza,C. L.
Chernicharo,C. A. L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Glória,R. M.
Motta,T. M.
Silva,P. V. O.
Costa,P. da
Brandt,E. M. F.
Souza,C. L.
Chernicharo,C. A. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dissipation chamber
Stripping
Dissolved methane
Hydrogen sulphide
Gaseous emissions
UASB reactor
topic Dissipation chamber
Stripping
Dissolved methane
Hydrogen sulphide
Gaseous emissions
UASB reactor
description Abstract UASB reactors are a common technology for wastewater treatment. However, certain disadvantages must be considered. One of the disadvantages relates to the presence of dissolved gases, hydrogen sulfide and methane, in the effluent, which can potentially be released into the atmosphere. This can cause malodours and contribute to the greenhouse effect. In this perspective, this work investigated alternative techniques to minimize these disadvantages: air stripping inside the settling compartment; and a dissipation chamber immediately after the reactor outlet. Results achieved with the air stripping technique showed low removal efficiencies for methane, around 30%, and in the range of 40 to 60% for hydrogen sulfide. On the other hand, the removal efficiencies obtained with the dissipation chamber technique were much higher, consistently reaching 60% or more for both gases, plus a relatively lower exhaust flow. For the best operational condition tested, median removal efficiencies of 73 and 97% were observed for dissolved methane and dissolved sulfide, respectively.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322016000400713
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322016000400713
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.33 n.4 2016
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213175127965696