Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000300005 |
Resumo: | This work compares the performance of two Lagrangian turbulent particle dispersion models: the standard model (e.g., that presented in Sommerfeld et al. (1993)), in which the fluctuating fluid velocity experienced by the particle is composed of two components, one correlated with the previous time step and a second one randomly sampled from a Wiener process, and the model proposed by Minier and Peirano (2001), which is based on the PDF approach and performs closure at the level of acceleration of the fluid experienced by the particle. Formulation of a Langevin equation model for the increments of fluid velocity seen by the particle allows capturing some underlying physics of particle dispersion in general turbulent flows while keeping the mathematical manipulation of the stochastic model simple, thereby avoiding some pitfalls and simplifying the derivation of macroscopic relations. The performance of both dispersion models is tested in the configurations of grid-generated turbulence (Wells and Stock (1983) experiments), simple shear flow (Hyland et al., 1999) and confined axisymmetric jet flow laden with solids (Hishida and Maeda (1987) experiments). |
id |
ABEQ-1_3ece84f8f33eaf5560ee1d793327326a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-66322007000300005 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEQ-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flowsTurbulenceTwo-phase flowTurbulent particle dispersionLagrangian approachThis work compares the performance of two Lagrangian turbulent particle dispersion models: the standard model (e.g., that presented in Sommerfeld et al. (1993)), in which the fluctuating fluid velocity experienced by the particle is composed of two components, one correlated with the previous time step and a second one randomly sampled from a Wiener process, and the model proposed by Minier and Peirano (2001), which is based on the PDF approach and performs closure at the level of acceleration of the fluid experienced by the particle. Formulation of a Langevin equation model for the increments of fluid velocity seen by the particle allows capturing some underlying physics of particle dispersion in general turbulent flows while keeping the mathematical manipulation of the stochastic model simple, thereby avoiding some pitfalls and simplifying the derivation of macroscopic relations. The performance of both dispersion models is tested in the configurations of grid-generated turbulence (Wells and Stock (1983) experiments), simple shear flow (Hyland et al., 1999) and confined axisymmetric jet flow laden with solids (Hishida and Maeda (1987) experiments).Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2007-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000300005Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.24 n.3 2007reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322007000300005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLaín,S.Grillo,C. A.eng2007-11-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322007000300005Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2007-11-23T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
title |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows Laín,S. Turbulence Two-phase flow Turbulent particle dispersion Lagrangian approach |
title_short |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
title_full |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
title_sort |
Comparison of turbulent particle dispersion models in turbulent shear flows |
author |
Laín,S. |
author_facet |
Laín,S. Grillo,C. A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grillo,C. A. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Laín,S. Grillo,C. A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Turbulence Two-phase flow Turbulent particle dispersion Lagrangian approach |
topic |
Turbulence Two-phase flow Turbulent particle dispersion Lagrangian approach |
description |
This work compares the performance of two Lagrangian turbulent particle dispersion models: the standard model (e.g., that presented in Sommerfeld et al. (1993)), in which the fluctuating fluid velocity experienced by the particle is composed of two components, one correlated with the previous time step and a second one randomly sampled from a Wiener process, and the model proposed by Minier and Peirano (2001), which is based on the PDF approach and performs closure at the level of acceleration of the fluid experienced by the particle. Formulation of a Langevin equation model for the increments of fluid velocity seen by the particle allows capturing some underlying physics of particle dispersion in general turbulent flows while keeping the mathematical manipulation of the stochastic model simple, thereby avoiding some pitfalls and simplifying the derivation of macroscopic relations. The performance of both dispersion models is tested in the configurations of grid-generated turbulence (Wells and Stock (1983) experiments), simple shear flow (Hyland et al., 1999) and confined axisymmetric jet flow laden with solids (Hishida and Maeda (1987) experiments). |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000300005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000300005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0104-66322007000300005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.24 n.3 2007 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) instacron:ABEQ |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
instacron_str |
ABEQ |
institution |
ABEQ |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br |
_version_ |
1754213172313587712 |