Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neumann,G. A.
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Finkler,T. F., Cardozo,N. S. M., Secchi,A. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000200011
Resumo: Product development and advanced control applications require models with good predictive capability. However, in some cases it is not possible to obtain good quality phenomenological models due to the lack of data or the presence of important unmeasured effects. The use of empirical models requires less investment in modeling, but implies the need for larger amounts of experimental data to generate models with good predictive capability. In this work, nonlinear phenomenological and empirical models were compared with respect to their capability to predict the melt index and polymer yield of a low-density polyethylene production process consisting of two fluidized bed reactors connected in series. To adjust the phenomenological model, the optimization algorithms based on the flexible polyhedron method of Nelder and Mead showed the best efficiency. To adjust the empirical model, the PLS model was more appropriate for polymer yield, and the melt index needed more nonlinearity like the QPLS models. In the comparison between these two types of models better results were obtained for the empirical models.
id ABEQ-1_44a200f331ff609bf574b3db8fad26f8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322007000200011
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor modelsEthylene polymerizationParameter estimationEmpirical modelPhenomenological modelLLDPEProduct development and advanced control applications require models with good predictive capability. However, in some cases it is not possible to obtain good quality phenomenological models due to the lack of data or the presence of important unmeasured effects. The use of empirical models requires less investment in modeling, but implies the need for larger amounts of experimental data to generate models with good predictive capability. In this work, nonlinear phenomenological and empirical models were compared with respect to their capability to predict the melt index and polymer yield of a low-density polyethylene production process consisting of two fluidized bed reactors connected in series. To adjust the phenomenological model, the optimization algorithms based on the flexible polyhedron method of Nelder and Mead showed the best efficiency. To adjust the empirical model, the PLS model was more appropriate for polymer yield, and the melt index needed more nonlinearity like the QPLS models. In the comparison between these two types of models better results were obtained for the empirical models.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2007-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000200011Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.24 n.2 2007reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322007000200011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeumann,G. A.Finkler,T. F.Cardozo,N. S. M.Secchi,A. R.eng2007-07-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322007000200011Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2007-07-23T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
title Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
spellingShingle Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
Neumann,G. A.
Ethylene polymerization
Parameter estimation
Empirical model
Phenomenological model
LLDPE
title_short Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
title_full Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
title_fullStr Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
title_full_unstemmed Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
title_sort Parameter estimation for LLDPE gas-phase reactor models
author Neumann,G. A.
author_facet Neumann,G. A.
Finkler,T. F.
Cardozo,N. S. M.
Secchi,A. R.
author_role author
author2 Finkler,T. F.
Cardozo,N. S. M.
Secchi,A. R.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neumann,G. A.
Finkler,T. F.
Cardozo,N. S. M.
Secchi,A. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ethylene polymerization
Parameter estimation
Empirical model
Phenomenological model
LLDPE
topic Ethylene polymerization
Parameter estimation
Empirical model
Phenomenological model
LLDPE
description Product development and advanced control applications require models with good predictive capability. However, in some cases it is not possible to obtain good quality phenomenological models due to the lack of data or the presence of important unmeasured effects. The use of empirical models requires less investment in modeling, but implies the need for larger amounts of experimental data to generate models with good predictive capability. In this work, nonlinear phenomenological and empirical models were compared with respect to their capability to predict the melt index and polymer yield of a low-density polyethylene production process consisting of two fluidized bed reactors connected in series. To adjust the phenomenological model, the optimization algorithms based on the flexible polyhedron method of Nelder and Mead showed the best efficiency. To adjust the empirical model, the PLS model was more appropriate for polymer yield, and the melt index needed more nonlinearity like the QPLS models. In the comparison between these two types of models better results were obtained for the empirical models.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000200011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322007000200011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-66322007000200011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.24 n.2 2007
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213172301004800