Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes,B. R. B.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Varavei,A., Marcondes,F., Sepehrnoori,K.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400016
Resumo: In compositional reservoir simulation, a set of non-linear partial differential equations must be solved. In this work, two numerical formulations are compared. The first formulation is based on an implicit pressure and explicit composition (IMPEC) procedure, and the second formulation uses an implicit pressure and implicit saturation (IMPSAT). The main goal of this work is to compare the formulations in terms of computational times for solving 2D and 3D compositional reservoir simulation case studies. In the comparison, both UDS (Upwind difference scheme) and third order TVD schemes were used. The computational results for the aforementioned formulations and the two interpolation functions are presented for several case studies involving homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs. Based on our comparison of IMPEC and IMPSAT formulations using several case studies presented in this work, the IMPSAT formulation was faster than the IMPEC formulation.
id ABEQ-1_4e7b74287ca91fa7975f002735ff0c12
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322014000400016
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulationCompositional reservoir simulationSegregated formulationIMPECIMPSATFinite-volume methodIn compositional reservoir simulation, a set of non-linear partial differential equations must be solved. In this work, two numerical formulations are compared. The first formulation is based on an implicit pressure and explicit composition (IMPEC) procedure, and the second formulation uses an implicit pressure and implicit saturation (IMPSAT). The main goal of this work is to compare the formulations in terms of computational times for solving 2D and 3D compositional reservoir simulation case studies. In the comparison, both UDS (Upwind difference scheme) and third order TVD schemes were used. The computational results for the aforementioned formulations and the two interpolation functions are presented for several case studies involving homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs. Based on our comparison of IMPEC and IMPSAT formulations using several case studies presented in this work, the IMPSAT formulation was faster than the IMPEC formulation.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400016Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.31 n.4 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/0104-6632.20140314s00003084info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes,B. R. B.Varavei,A.Marcondes,F.Sepehrnoori,K.eng2014-11-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322014000400016Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2014-11-14T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
title Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
spellingShingle Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
Fernandes,B. R. B.
Compositional reservoir simulation
Segregated formulation
IMPEC
IMPSAT
Finite-volume method
title_short Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
title_full Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
title_fullStr Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
title_sort Comparison of an impec and a semi-implicit formulation for compositional reservoir simulation
author Fernandes,B. R. B.
author_facet Fernandes,B. R. B.
Varavei,A.
Marcondes,F.
Sepehrnoori,K.
author_role author
author2 Varavei,A.
Marcondes,F.
Sepehrnoori,K.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes,B. R. B.
Varavei,A.
Marcondes,F.
Sepehrnoori,K.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compositional reservoir simulation
Segregated formulation
IMPEC
IMPSAT
Finite-volume method
topic Compositional reservoir simulation
Segregated formulation
IMPEC
IMPSAT
Finite-volume method
description In compositional reservoir simulation, a set of non-linear partial differential equations must be solved. In this work, two numerical formulations are compared. The first formulation is based on an implicit pressure and explicit composition (IMPEC) procedure, and the second formulation uses an implicit pressure and implicit saturation (IMPSAT). The main goal of this work is to compare the formulations in terms of computational times for solving 2D and 3D compositional reservoir simulation case studies. In the comparison, both UDS (Upwind difference scheme) and third order TVD schemes were used. The computational results for the aforementioned formulations and the two interpolation functions are presented for several case studies involving homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs. Based on our comparison of IMPEC and IMPSAT formulations using several case studies presented in this work, the IMPSAT formulation was faster than the IMPEC formulation.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0104-6632.20140314s00003084
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.31 n.4 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213174625697792