A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho,R. M. L.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Lage,P. L. C., Telles,A. Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322006000300004
Resumo: Classical and recent numerical schemes for solving hyperbolic conservation laws were analyzed for computational efficiency and application to nonideal gas flows. The Roe-Pike approximate Riemann solver with entropy correction, the Harten second-order scheme and the extension of the Roe-Pike method to second-order by the MUSCL strategy were compared for one-dimensional flows of an ideal gas. These methods require the so-called Roe's average state, which is frequently difficult and sometimes impossible to obtain. Other methods that do not require the average state are best suited for complex equations of state. Of these, the VFRoe, AUSM+ and Hybrid Lax-Friedrich-Lax-Wendroff methods were compared for one-dimensional compressible flows of a Van der Waals gas. All methods were evaluated regarding their accuracy for given mesh sizes and their computational cost for a given solution accuracy. It was shown that, even though they require more floating points and indirect addressing operations per time step, for a given time interval for integration the second-order methods are less-time consuming than the first-order methods for a required accuracy. It was also shown that AUSM+ and VFRoe are the most accurate methods and that AUSM+ is much faster than the others, and is thus recommended for nonideal one-phase gas flows.
id ABEQ-1_6c5ef3d06c83753b18d837a2f1b2a589
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322006000300004
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flowsHyperbolic conservation lawsRiemann solversRoe solverVFRoeAUSM+Hybrid schemesReal gasesCompressible flowClassical and recent numerical schemes for solving hyperbolic conservation laws were analyzed for computational efficiency and application to nonideal gas flows. The Roe-Pike approximate Riemann solver with entropy correction, the Harten second-order scheme and the extension of the Roe-Pike method to second-order by the MUSCL strategy were compared for one-dimensional flows of an ideal gas. These methods require the so-called Roe's average state, which is frequently difficult and sometimes impossible to obtain. Other methods that do not require the average state are best suited for complex equations of state. Of these, the VFRoe, AUSM+ and Hybrid Lax-Friedrich-Lax-Wendroff methods were compared for one-dimensional compressible flows of a Van der Waals gas. All methods were evaluated regarding their accuracy for given mesh sizes and their computational cost for a given solution accuracy. It was shown that, even though they require more floating points and indirect addressing operations per time step, for a given time interval for integration the second-order methods are less-time consuming than the first-order methods for a required accuracy. It was also shown that AUSM+ and VFRoe are the most accurate methods and that AUSM+ is much faster than the others, and is thus recommended for nonideal one-phase gas flows.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2006-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322006000300004Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.23 n.3 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322006000300004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho,R. M. L.Lage,P. L. C.Telles,A. Silvaeng2006-12-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322006000300004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2006-12-14T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
title A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
spellingShingle A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
Coelho,R. M. L.
Hyperbolic conservation laws
Riemann solvers
Roe solver
VFRoe
AUSM+
Hybrid schemes
Real gases
Compressible flow
title_short A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
title_full A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
title_fullStr A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
title_sort A comparison of hyperbolic solvers for ideal and real gas flows
author Coelho,R. M. L.
author_facet Coelho,R. M. L.
Lage,P. L. C.
Telles,A. Silva
author_role author
author2 Lage,P. L. C.
Telles,A. Silva
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho,R. M. L.
Lage,P. L. C.
Telles,A. Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hyperbolic conservation laws
Riemann solvers
Roe solver
VFRoe
AUSM+
Hybrid schemes
Real gases
Compressible flow
topic Hyperbolic conservation laws
Riemann solvers
Roe solver
VFRoe
AUSM+
Hybrid schemes
Real gases
Compressible flow
description Classical and recent numerical schemes for solving hyperbolic conservation laws were analyzed for computational efficiency and application to nonideal gas flows. The Roe-Pike approximate Riemann solver with entropy correction, the Harten second-order scheme and the extension of the Roe-Pike method to second-order by the MUSCL strategy were compared for one-dimensional flows of an ideal gas. These methods require the so-called Roe's average state, which is frequently difficult and sometimes impossible to obtain. Other methods that do not require the average state are best suited for complex equations of state. Of these, the VFRoe, AUSM+ and Hybrid Lax-Friedrich-Lax-Wendroff methods were compared for one-dimensional compressible flows of a Van der Waals gas. All methods were evaluated regarding their accuracy for given mesh sizes and their computational cost for a given solution accuracy. It was shown that, even though they require more floating points and indirect addressing operations per time step, for a given time interval for integration the second-order methods are less-time consuming than the first-order methods for a required accuracy. It was also shown that AUSM+ and VFRoe are the most accurate methods and that AUSM+ is much faster than the others, and is thus recommended for nonideal one-phase gas flows.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322006000300004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322006000300004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-66322006000300004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.23 n.3 2006
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213172228653056