EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1998 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66321998000300009 |
Resumo: | Acid sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate was submitted to pH shifts in order to remove toxic compounds from the medium. The hydrolyzate was treated with bases containing mono-, di- or tri-valent cations and H2SO4, and its performance as a fermentation medium was evaluated by the production of xylitol by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037. The use of bases containing mono-valent cations was not an efficient method of detoxification, and the use of a tri-valent cation did not show any detectable improvement in detoxification. The treated hydrolyzate recovery (in volume) is greatly affected by the utilized base. Treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH showed the best hydrolyzate recovery (87.5%), while the others presented a recovery of about 45% of the original hydrolyzate volume. Considering the whole process, best results were achieved by treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH which allowed 0.55 g of xylitol produced from each gram of xylose in the raw hydrolyzate. |
id |
ABEQ-1_7aaf324ffe065f4b99ebca29de79577b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-66321998000300009 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEQ-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTIONSugarcane bagasse hydrolyzatexylitol productionCandida guilliermondiiAcid sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate was submitted to pH shifts in order to remove toxic compounds from the medium. The hydrolyzate was treated with bases containing mono-, di- or tri-valent cations and H2SO4, and its performance as a fermentation medium was evaluated by the production of xylitol by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037. The use of bases containing mono-valent cations was not an efficient method of detoxification, and the use of a tri-valent cation did not show any detectable improvement in detoxification. The treated hydrolyzate recovery (in volume) is greatly affected by the utilized base. Treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH showed the best hydrolyzate recovery (87.5%), while the others presented a recovery of about 45% of the original hydrolyzate volume. Considering the whole process, best results were achieved by treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH which allowed 0.55 g of xylitol produced from each gram of xylose in the raw hydrolyzate.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering1998-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66321998000300009Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.15 n.3 1998reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66321998000300009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGURGEL,P.V.FURLAN,S.A.MARTINEZ,S.E.R.MANCILHA,I.M.eng1998-10-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66321998000300009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:1998-10-27T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
title |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
spellingShingle |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION GURGEL,P.V. Sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate xylitol production Candida guilliermondii |
title_short |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
title_full |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
title_sort |
EVALUATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE ACID HYDROLYZATE TREATMENTS FOR XYLITOL PRODUCTION |
author |
GURGEL,P.V. |
author_facet |
GURGEL,P.V. FURLAN,S.A. MARTINEZ,S.E.R. MANCILHA,I.M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
FURLAN,S.A. MARTINEZ,S.E.R. MANCILHA,I.M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
GURGEL,P.V. FURLAN,S.A. MARTINEZ,S.E.R. MANCILHA,I.M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate xylitol production Candida guilliermondii |
topic |
Sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate xylitol production Candida guilliermondii |
description |
Acid sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate was submitted to pH shifts in order to remove toxic compounds from the medium. The hydrolyzate was treated with bases containing mono-, di- or tri-valent cations and H2SO4, and its performance as a fermentation medium was evaluated by the production of xylitol by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037. The use of bases containing mono-valent cations was not an efficient method of detoxification, and the use of a tri-valent cation did not show any detectable improvement in detoxification. The treated hydrolyzate recovery (in volume) is greatly affected by the utilized base. Treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH showed the best hydrolyzate recovery (87.5%), while the others presented a recovery of about 45% of the original hydrolyzate volume. Considering the whole process, best results were achieved by treatment using Al(OH)3 and NaOH which allowed 0.55 g of xylitol produced from each gram of xylose in the raw hydrolyzate. |
publishDate |
1998 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1998-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66321998000300009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66321998000300009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0104-66321998000300009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.15 n.3 1998 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) instacron:ABEQ |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
instacron_str |
ABEQ |
institution |
ABEQ |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br |
_version_ |
1754213170365333504 |