Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castier,M.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Checoni,R. F., Zuber,A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400017
Resumo: This work compares two strategies to fit parameters of equations of state in parallel computers, emphasizing solutions that require few changes to existing sequential programs. One strategy uses the conventional Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with parallel objective function evaluation (SSPO). The other strategy uses a parallel Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with sequential objective function evaluation (PSSO). The PSSO strategy, which executes parallel one-dimensional searches during each iteration, is simpler to implement and converged to parameter sets with objective functions smaller than those obtained by the SSPO strategy. The SSPO strategy produced speedups consistent with the number of processes used and is more suitable when many processors are available. Both strategies are potentially useful and choosing between them is a matter of convenience, depending on the problem at hand. With parallel computers increasingly available, the easy implementation and convenience of these two strategies should appeal to developers and users of thermodynamic models.
id ABEQ-1_7b0c7074b76b8fd950110c5c2ccb31fb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322014000400017
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computersEquations of stateParallelMessage passing interfaceParameter fittingThis work compares two strategies to fit parameters of equations of state in parallel computers, emphasizing solutions that require few changes to existing sequential programs. One strategy uses the conventional Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with parallel objective function evaluation (SSPO). The other strategy uses a parallel Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with sequential objective function evaluation (PSSO). The PSSO strategy, which executes parallel one-dimensional searches during each iteration, is simpler to implement and converged to parameter sets with objective functions smaller than those obtained by the SSPO strategy. The SSPO strategy produced speedups consistent with the number of processes used and is more suitable when many processors are available. Both strategies are potentially useful and choosing between them is a matter of convenience, depending on the problem at hand. With parallel computers increasingly available, the easy implementation and convenience of these two strategies should appeal to developers and users of thermodynamic models.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400017Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.31 n.4 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/0104-6632.20140314s00002632info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastier,M.Checoni,R. F.Zuber,A.eng2014-11-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322014000400017Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2014-11-14T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
title Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
spellingShingle Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
Castier,M.
Equations of state
Parallel
Message passing interface
Parameter fitting
title_short Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
title_full Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
title_fullStr Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
title_full_unstemmed Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
title_sort Fitting equation of state parameters in parallel computers
author Castier,M.
author_facet Castier,M.
Checoni,R. F.
Zuber,A.
author_role author
author2 Checoni,R. F.
Zuber,A.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castier,M.
Checoni,R. F.
Zuber,A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Equations of state
Parallel
Message passing interface
Parameter fitting
topic Equations of state
Parallel
Message passing interface
Parameter fitting
description This work compares two strategies to fit parameters of equations of state in parallel computers, emphasizing solutions that require few changes to existing sequential programs. One strategy uses the conventional Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with parallel objective function evaluation (SSPO). The other strategy uses a parallel Nelder-Mead algorithm coupled with sequential objective function evaluation (PSSO). The PSSO strategy, which executes parallel one-dimensional searches during each iteration, is simpler to implement and converged to parameter sets with objective functions smaller than those obtained by the SSPO strategy. The SSPO strategy produced speedups consistent with the number of processes used and is more suitable when many processors are available. Both strategies are potentially useful and choosing between them is a matter of convenience, depending on the problem at hand. With parallel computers increasingly available, the easy implementation and convenience of these two strategies should appeal to developers and users of thermodynamic models.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322014000400017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0104-6632.20140314s00002632
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.31 n.4 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213174626746368