Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gerber,R. P.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Soares,R. P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000100002
Resumo: Currently, the most successful predictive models for activity coefficients are those based on functional groups such as UNIFAC. In contrast, these models require a large amount of experimental data for the determination of their parameter matrix. A more recent alternative is the models based on COSMO, for which only a small set of universal parameters must be calibrated. In this work, a recalibrated COSMO-SAC model was compared with the UNIFAC (Do) model employing experimental infinite dilution activity coefficient data for 2236 non-hydrogen-bonding binary mixtures at different temperatures. As expected, UNIFAC (Do) presented better overall performance, with a mean absolute error of 0.12 ln-units against 0.22 for our COSMO-SAC implementation. However, in cases involving molecules with several functional groups or when functional groups appear in an unusual way, the deviation for UNIFAC was 0.44 as opposed to 0.20 for COSMO-SAC. These results show that COSMO-SAC provides more reliable predictions for multi-functional or more complex molecules, reaffirming its future prospects.
id ABEQ-1_8c6aa3d73a140258a00d63819558d083
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322013000100002
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groupsCOSMO-SACIDACMOPACQuantum mechanicalUNIFACCurrently, the most successful predictive models for activity coefficients are those based on functional groups such as UNIFAC. In contrast, these models require a large amount of experimental data for the determination of their parameter matrix. A more recent alternative is the models based on COSMO, for which only a small set of universal parameters must be calibrated. In this work, a recalibrated COSMO-SAC model was compared with the UNIFAC (Do) model employing experimental infinite dilution activity coefficient data for 2236 non-hydrogen-bonding binary mixtures at different temperatures. As expected, UNIFAC (Do) presented better overall performance, with a mean absolute error of 0.12 ln-units against 0.22 for our COSMO-SAC implementation. However, in cases involving molecules with several functional groups or when functional groups appear in an unusual way, the deviation for UNIFAC was 0.44 as opposed to 0.20 for COSMO-SAC. These results show that COSMO-SAC provides more reliable predictions for multi-functional or more complex molecules, reaffirming its future prospects.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000100002Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.30 n.1 2013reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322013000100002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGerber,R. P.Soares,R. P.eng2013-03-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322013000100002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2013-03-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
title Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
spellingShingle Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
Gerber,R. P.
COSMO-SAC
IDAC
MOPAC
Quantum mechanical
UNIFAC
title_short Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
title_full Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
title_fullStr Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
title_sort Assessing the reliability of predictive activity coefficient models for molecules consisting of several functional groups
author Gerber,R. P.
author_facet Gerber,R. P.
Soares,R. P.
author_role author
author2 Soares,R. P.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gerber,R. P.
Soares,R. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COSMO-SAC
IDAC
MOPAC
Quantum mechanical
UNIFAC
topic COSMO-SAC
IDAC
MOPAC
Quantum mechanical
UNIFAC
description Currently, the most successful predictive models for activity coefficients are those based on functional groups such as UNIFAC. In contrast, these models require a large amount of experimental data for the determination of their parameter matrix. A more recent alternative is the models based on COSMO, for which only a small set of universal parameters must be calibrated. In this work, a recalibrated COSMO-SAC model was compared with the UNIFAC (Do) model employing experimental infinite dilution activity coefficient data for 2236 non-hydrogen-bonding binary mixtures at different temperatures. As expected, UNIFAC (Do) presented better overall performance, with a mean absolute error of 0.12 ln-units against 0.22 for our COSMO-SAC implementation. However, in cases involving molecules with several functional groups or when functional groups appear in an unusual way, the deviation for UNIFAC was 0.44 as opposed to 0.20 for COSMO-SAC. These results show that COSMO-SAC provides more reliable predictions for multi-functional or more complex molecules, reaffirming its future prospects.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000100002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-66322013000100002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.30 n.1 2013
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213173874917376